District 7 City Council Forum
Tom Jenney: Provided taxpayers with a hero at this forum
The last soirée of the council forums, this one drew the largest crowd. The event was again sponsored by the Valley Citizen’s League, the ASU School of Public Affairs and the Arizona Republic. Moderator Richard de Uriarte, editorial writer for the Republic, has perfected his repetitive and inane “lightening round,” down to somewhat of a science, asking candidates such probing posers as their favorite book and restaurant. The panel of questioners included Norris Nordvold, longtime lobbyist for the City of Phoenix, James Svara, an ASU Professor in the School of Public Affairs and Director of the Center for Urban Innovation and Casey Newton, City Hall reporter for the Arizona Republic.
The stifling room at the Irish Cultural Center seemed an odd place to hold the event which often appeared to center on issues resonating with the Hispanic community. For example, one question dealt with how best to encourage the undercounted Hispanic populace within the district to cooperate with the upcoming census so accompanying federal dollars will be increased. Discussion also centered on crime and safety, preserving historic neighborhoods, transportation and increasing revenue.
Candidates included:
Art Harding : Deputy Associate Superintendent with the AZ Department of Education. Involvement in English Language Learner’s Task Force, helping students learn English to be more competitive in society. “Current city council is disconnected from us.” Small businesses in district need to thrive to invigorate community. Opposes sanctuary city policies in Phoenix, saying it is a simple matter for police to check status of those they stop and turn offenders over to Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). Harding said he would reconnect with the voters, have more face-to-face meetings.” Advocates reduction of property taxes.
Ruth Ann Marston : Former school principal and community activist. Reelected to school board. Prioritizes affordable housing. On the question of undercounted Hispanics, she said it works well to go into the schools, adding” have the children talk to their parents about the importance of the census.” (This raises the ethical question of whether schoolchildren should be approached to assist in providing any family information to authorities.) Marston twice gave out her home telephone number, which she said is listed, inviting people to call her, saying “You need direct access to council persons.” Advocates allowing more people to work from home to alleviate traffic congestion. Would lower taxes for small businesses. To lower crime, she suggests “more mediators out on the street, where people are violent toward each other and in their own homes.”
Michael Nowakowski : Former Director of Hispanic Ministry for the Phoenix Diocese, now General Manager KNAI Radio Campesina. Family of Cesar Chavez volunteered to assist campaign. Endorsed by Sierra Club and various police and fire unions. “It’s time for me to give back” to community. Concerned about “kids on skateboards and bikes hurting themselves.” Census question was answered, “I’m a person who actually speaks Spanish—I run Spanish media.” As to implementing changes if elected, “We have a great system, but we need to overhaul it.” Wants to “streamline process to help minority businesses.”
Laura Pastor : Training coordinator AZ Department of Economic Security and former teacher. Endorsed by Mayor Phil Gordon. “I’m a consensus builder and we need to make an investment in our community,” are her repeated themes. Referring to her father US Rep. Ed Pastor, she said, “I have a relationship that will enable me to hit the ground running.” On census count: I can build consensus in the neighborhoods, encourage outreach….I know your neighborhood,….we need to involve the unions.” “We need funding….we need to invest in our community….developers will pay for infrastructure such as water and sewers.” Wants continuation of light rail to South Mountain.
There were the expected presentations by the proponents of the ballot Propositions, reminding the audience that 2/10 of 1 percent sales tax generated by Prop. 1, would be a “sustainable revenue” for increased police and fire fighters.
A vote for Prop. 3, innocuously called Home Rule, authorizes expansion of taxing authority and was described as being “in the interest of our future.” The Republic’s de Uriarte, has not remained neutral at any of the forums he has moderated, speaking in favor of the expansion, saying, ”Our water, our very quality of life will be sliced by one third.”
Tom Jenney, Executive Director of the Arizona Federation of Taxpayers, made compelling arguments to vote against Propositions 1 and 3, calling them “fiscally irresponsible.
”Prop.1:
“If Mayor Gordon and the members of the Phoenix City Council really think police and fire need an additional $60 million a year, why have they voted to spend over $300 million on programs other than police and fire during each of the past two years?” he asked. His question was greeted with applause. “It’s a scam,” he added.
Prop. 3
Jenney said the proposition, “relies on threats and scare tactics. Politicians who tell Phoenicians that the defeat of Prop 3 would mean cuts in basic services, police and fire, are dishonest. Passage of Prop 3 will prevent Phoenix from making significant tax reductions.” He said, “a funny thing happens with politicians if they are allowed to spend every dollar they can get their hands on—they WILL!”
Proliferation of payday loan businesses are an issue within the district, generating calls to constituents. Pastor called Nowakowski’s tactics, “mudslinging,” saying she is not a supporter of such businesses. Nowakowski countered by saying “telling the truth is not mudslinging…payday loan establishments are charging 300 percent interest.” Marston said it was a legislative issue, but the businesses could be kept out of neighborhoods. Nowakowski said the city was “stuck,” agreeing that action must be taken on the “state level.”
August 16, 2007 at 12:38 pm
The undercurrent of District 7 needing to address “Hispanic”concerns tells the real story of the fallacy of having districts rather than city-wide seats. With districts, councilmen respond to their own specific area rather than to issues impacting Phoenix as a whole. I find this troubling. Are we going to end up with ethnic Chicago-like neighborhoods with Polish and Italian councilmen representing their own groups? Of course not! But is this any better?
We are a city of Phoenicians. Our religion or ethnicity should have nothing to do with who represents us on the council or in the legislature. The good of the entire city should be the goal of each and every council person elected.
August 16, 2007 at 1:33 pm
[...] Red debate coverage. [...]
August 16, 2007 at 2:05 pm
Thanks for this coverage of district 7candidates. I have lived in the district for the better part of the last decade, but have been thoroughly confused by the lack of meaningful information.
Art Harding’s opposition to sanctuary cities and saying that police actually have the ability to check immigration status of those they stop, sounds mighty good to me. I also like the idea of teaching English to assist students living in America with speaking the language that will benefit them.
August 17, 2007 at 11:40 am
The Center for Arizona Policy has posted its Municipal Voter’s Guides for Phoenix and Tucson on its web site. Sadly, even after multiple contacts encouraging candidates to answer the survey, only a minority of candidates are allowing the voters to find out how they stand on the issues important to families. The survey gives contact information for those who did not want to answer the survey, and residents of Phoenix and Tucson are encouraged to call the candidates themselves to find out how they stand on the issues.
August 28, 2007 at 9:58 am
Say no on prop 1. Phoenix has really grown over the past 20 years. And the tax base has grown with it. A proportionate chunk of that tax base should have gone to both the fire department and police automatically to keep up with the growth. It obviously has not. I sent an e-mail to the mayor asking him to explain. He has never responded. It is funny since he always responds to day to day issues. I think, in a way, he has given us all the answer.
I suggest that rather than passing prop 1 we put the mayor and city council under investigation for misappropriation of tax revenue while we have an independent audit of city spending for at least the last 10 years.
The people of this city need to know what is going on, and it needs to be heard from the roof tops. Prop 1 sounds good on the surface until you begin to examine the need and why.