The Census is upon us. Who could miss the numerous articles in the daily; most fretting over whether Hispanics will participate for fear of reprisals by law enforcement? “Years of debate over immigration reforms could have a chilling effect on Hispanic participation in this particular census,” they write.
Of course if those “Hispanics” are legal, they have nothing to worry about. If they are not, they shouldn’t be participating in a crucial headcount of America’s citizens. But this year about 13 million forms in Spanish will be sent to areas with high concentrations of people who speak Spanish. And for the first time ever, the 2010 count will tally “immigrant indigenous groups,” charmingly described as having a “distrust of the government.”
Wonder why?
There is a lot a stake, as we are reminded. Congressional representation is allotted based on population count, meaning a couple of new congressional districts could be in Arizona’s future. Where the population growth is recorded has the possibility of shaking up the redistricting lines currently in place. Merit selection of judges is sure to be expanded beyond Maricopa and Pima counties, when the 250,000 population threshold is exceeded in growing rural counties – thrusting them into a mix that removes their right to elect their judges.
The daily wrings its hands over what they view as Arizona being shortchanged by tens of millions of dollars in federal funding over the next decade, if the count is “inaccurate.”
Since the government does nothing to generate money, this federal manna from heaven is actually the feds dipping into our own back pockets to make us think we are getting something without cost. The newspaper phrases it this way: “The census directs the flow of trillions of dollars from Washington.” They have it exactly backwards, and are not factoring in the increasing national debt, but that’s the liberal mindset.
The Obama administration is allocating $340 million for this sham, with the certain involvement of the criminal enterprise ACORN, under whatever alias they might be using this time around.
But regional office spokesman, Doug Wayland said the Census Bureau plans its own targeted media campaign, a strategy that helped lift the national response rate in 2000. “This time it will be directed at ethnic media outlets in traditionally hard-to-reach communities,” he said.
Figure that?
January 5, 2010 at 4:19 pm
Meanwhile, as reported on Drudge, BHO is working behind his not so transparent curtain to set the stage for “a pathway to citizenship” as promised to the Latinos for getting out the vote.
(http://www.baltimoresun.com/health/sns-dc-immig29-final,0,5744314,full.story)
Couple legalizing 20 million or more illegals with the healthcare overhaul and you can write off the United States and say hello to Mex-America, complete with the required two classes: the uber rich and everyone else. Drug lords running towns, education only for those who can pay through the nose, horrible corruption (the American brand is peanuts comparatively speaking)and the breakdown of services is only the first step.
This will be a fight like no other in our lifetime. We’d better be ready.
January 5, 2010 at 7:35 pm
READY!
January 5, 2010 at 7:46 pm
Sherriaz:
I fear what you say is true. I also fear for my young children and theirs. We are living in disastrous times under a “leader” who hates America. The fact that he was able to be elected is a testament to the liberal education unions who have destroyed the thinking capacity of American students attending government schools.
January 5, 2010 at 8:22 pm
Great point about federal dollars! Also, what in the hell are “indigenous groups” being counted for? The Republic article makes it clear they are not citizens, but Central American tribal people. Why are they enumerated in our census? Next thing they’ll be registered as Democrats, legal or not. I am so fed up with what is going on under this administration. Obama was to see us ruined. First he went around the globe apologizing for our superiority, now he wants to ensure it goes away.
January 5, 2010 at 9:17 pm
That Baltimore Sun article was informative. Thanks, Sherri. This is getting nuttier with each passing day. I sure don’t recall my parents being wary of the census. I am!
January 6, 2010 at 10:32 pm
Just my opinion, fellow conservatives & lovers of Liberty & Freedom-
When these people come to the door, 1st, ask politely, but firmly, to see verification of WHO YOU ARE TALKING TOO. Do NOT step out, & DO NOT invite them in.
2nd, answer ONLY the questions you feel are pertinant to a COUNT. These people,DO NOT NEED TO KNOW financial info, how many cars you have, what brand of toilet paper you buy, etc. Give them the bare esssentials!
January 6, 2010 at 11:11 pm
Doc:
Here’s something you might find of interest. I did.
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2009/06/18/politics/politicalhotsheet/entry5095844.shtml
January 7, 2010 at 9:21 am
Representative Bachmann is correct, in my opinion. As to the $5000.00 fine, I guess they’ll have to put me in the pokey…cuz’ I’m NOT answering any other questions than the count. No actual NAMES from my house will be given, no FINANCIAL info, no WEAPONS info, etc.
I heard someone yesterday talking on the radio about how it’s constitutionally allowed that they can ask certain “extra” questions…& I’m looking into THAT, & will let seeing red & ALL know what I come up with.