Imperial Obama signs executive order restricting guns, ammo

Disarmament is the necessary precursor to tyranny

Noted conservative scholar, syndicated columnist and economist Dr. Walter E. Williams states that most Americans misunderstand the point of the Second Amendment.  The purpose, says Williams, is to protect ourselves against domestic tyranny of our own government — not simply to allow for deer and duck hunting.

“When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

– Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776

 The facts are clear — the forces of tyranny are running wild across our once great Republic. And across the nation responses have been swift:

N.Y. State Sen. Greg Ball, a proud Conservative, addresses Democrat N.Y. Gov. Andrew Cuomo’s gun grab, the fiery centerpiece of his State of the State speech  — as an effort to advance extremist Cuomo’s presidential aspirations. The restrictive bans provide him another liberal constituency in his shadow 2016 campaign on the heels of passage of a bill to legalize same-sex marriage.

Cuomo was in such a rush to get the gun bill which he called “The Toughest Assault Weapon Ban in the Nation, Period!”  — before him for signature, that numerous mistakes were made that will require legislative corrections to his showboating. One problem? Police agencies were not exempted from the restrictions on bullets.

In Oregon, Linn County Sheriff Tim Mueller, has written a letter to Vice President Joe Biden saying his department will not enforce any new gun laws it considers unconstitutional.

“We’re restricted and prohibited from enforcing all types of federal laws, including immigration laws,” Sheriff Mueller said. “It would be unreasonable for anyone to think that I would enforce a federal firearms law.” (Click letter to enlarge.)

Sheriff_Mueller_letter_to_VP_Biden

About these ads

40 Responses to Imperial Obama signs executive order restricting guns, ammo

  1. Army Of One says:

    Dr. Williams, NY Sen. Ball and Sheriff Mueller have all hit the mark! Americans are finally wising up, albeit too late since the oppressive dictator is back in office for another 4 years. But they are waking up to the fact that our nation and its founding documents are at risk. Lines at gun shows are breaking all records. Sales are leaving shelves bare.

    • eubykdisop says:

      It’s by no means too late, Army Of One. In fact, I think that this is going to be where B. Hussein Obama meets his Waterloo!

      From what I’ve been reading, not even Senate Democrats, including Harry Reid, are willing to bring up gun control legislation. Obama is going to have to go the executive order route and I believe that SCOTUS will strike that down in a hearbeat. Why? Well, not only because of the 2nd Amendment but also because it is well established that gun control measures have always been legislated. The fact that such restrictions on guns have always been legislated is strong prima facie evidence that gun control measures MUST be legislated, rather than implemented by executive order.

      I think that Obama has overplayed his hand on this one and that he and his fellow Democrats are going to pay the price starting in two years during the midterms.

  2. Westnash says:

    I like and agree with much of what Williams says. He is well known as much more of a Libertarian than what many would call conservatives. This may chap those who follow Joe McCarthy, but not the other 99.9% of the people.

    • Stanford says:

      Give it a rest, Westnash. Your constant off topic screeds are shopworn and tiresome. Respond to the post and stop lobbing undercuts. This is important news concerning the usurping of powers and restricting of our Constitutional rights. I rarely comment anymore because you have attempted to take over the entire section. Say something relevant or lumber back to your cave.

    • eubykdisop says:

      Ah, I see that you still haven’t been able to take in the facts about decorated combat veteran and U. S. Senator Joseph McCarthy. I’m a patient man, Westnash. Here it is for you again!

      “In his famous speech on February 9th, 1950, McCarthy brought public a list of 57 known communists working for the state department. These revelations took the American public by storm. Out of all the Senators and public figures in Washington, only McCarthy had the courage to stand up against communist infiltration. It was a deed that McCarthy’s leftist critics would never forgive him for.”

      “He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the United States, inside the federal government. He was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted Venona files.”

      What are the Venona files?

      “The Venona project intercepted codes passed among agents of the communist Soviet Union during World War II, and attempted to decrypt them.”

      “After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the KGB and Comintern Archives in Moscow became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy’s underlying premise.”

      The Moynihan Secrecy Commission stated that:

      “The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement.”

      Hayden Peake, curator of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, “No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.”

      Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Chairman of the bipartisan Commission on Government Secrecy, responsible for securing the release of Venona project materials, in the Introduction to his book Secrecy states, “The Venona intercepts contained overwhelming proof of the activities of Soviet spy networks in America, complete with names, dates, places, and deeds.”

      “Over 200 named or covernamed persons found in the Venona translations, persons then present in the U.S., are claimed by the KGB and the GRU in their messages as their clandestine assets or contacts.”

      I understand that, being a Pinko, you are still angry with Senator McCarthy, 56 years after his death, for outing Communists in our country and in our federal government.

    • Joseph Bickley says:

      What you imply, Wetnash, is low-handed and obtuse. I admire both gentlemen (I guess that chaps followers of Karl Marx), so where does that put me on your percentage allocations?

      • eubykdisop says:

        Thank you for speaking out, Joseph!

        “All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.” – Edmund Burke

  3. eubykdisop says:

    Let’s see where the above poster, Westnash, stands on the political sprectrum. First, let’s look at his views on Communisim, Socialism and Marxism.

    “Westnash says:
    January 15, 2013 at 11:47 am
    Euby, this may come as a great shock to you but someone being a communist or socialist is not against the law.” Actually, it is against the law according to the Communist Control Act of 1954. Even if it weren’t against the law, Conservatives still oppose Communists, Socialists and Marxists.

    “Westnash says:
    January 11, 2013 at 3:41 am
    Obviously, Euby, it is easy for you to blame Marxism, but impossible to offer a solution for the Arizona Republicans. Hopefully there is someone in the party smarter than you.” Westnash is concerned that we are “blaming” Marxism. Please excuse us, Westnash.

    Next, let’s examine the 2nd Amendment views of Westnash.

    “Westnash says:
    January 8, 2013 at 8:00 am
    There will be some changes in gun regulations at some point in 2013 and the Republicans who only tow the NRA line of “no” will lose. Wouldn’t you rather outsmart your opponent than trying unsuccessfully in throwing up a wall, that is crumbling down around you.” I think that piece of Pinko propaganda speaks for itself.

    Westnash tells us that the “far right” is causing Republicans to lose elections. Here are five examples from Westnash of what he considers to be “far right”:

    “Westnash says:
    January 5, 2013 at 8:54 am
    Certainly,
    5 Far Right:
    1. Refusing to compromise on Gun Laws in wake of the recent shootings and publicity.
    2. Refusing to compromise on fiscal cliff issues.
    3. Touting Joe McCarthy for anything but the buffoon he was.
    4. Insisting on the full Military Budget.
    5. Refusing to discuss the immigration issue and developing a “guest worker” program.
    These are killer issues for the National Republican party.”

    Here is a response to Westnash by poster “1776″:

    “None of these issues are “far right.” They are quite reasonable stands that are labeled “far right” because that moves the baseline making the Democrat’s preference for Marxist socialism look less “ultra left.”

    In short, Westnash is a Pinko, which is the term for a Communist sypathizer.

    “Eat Mor Chikin!”, Westnash, LOL!

  4. Westnash says:

    “Stanford” should lash out as Euby for his name calling of other posters and SRA should put a stop to it.

    When the Democrats post a picture of a typical Republican, unfortunately it is of Euby…which is why they are winning!

  5. eubykdisop says:

    Let’s consider the political views of the above poster, Westnash. These are his views on Marxism, Socialism and Communism:

    “Westnash says:
    January 11, 2013 at 3:41 am
    Obviously, Euby, it is easy for you to blame Marxism, but impossible to offer a solution for the Arizona Republicans. Hopefully there is someone in the party smarter than you.” Westnash is concerned that we are “blaming” Marxism. Please excuse us, Westnash.

    “Westnash says:
    January 15, 2013 at 11:47 am
    Euby, this may come as a great shock to you but someone being a communist or socialist is not against the law.” Actually, it is against the law according to the Communist Control Act of 1954. Even if it weren’t against the law, Conservatives still oppose Communists, Socialists and Marxists.

    Westnash is “concerned”, as in “concern troll”, that Republicans are losing elections because of what he calls the “far right”. Here are five examples from Westnash of what he considers to be “far right”:

    “Westnash says:
    January 5, 2013 at 8:54 am
    Certainly,
    5 Far Right:
    1. Refusing to compromise on Gun Laws in wake of the recent shootings and publicity.
    2. Refusing to compromise on fiscal cliff issues.
    3. Touting Joe McCarthy for anything but the buffoon he was.
    4. Insisting on the full Military Budget.
    5. Refusing to discuss the immigration issue and developing a “guest worker” program.
    These are killer issues for the National Republican party.”

    This response to what Westnash considers to be “far right”, and costing Republicans elections, by poster “1776″ says it all:

    “None of these issues are “far right.” They are quite reasonable stands that are labeled “far right” because that moves the baseline making the Democrat’s preference for Marxist socialism look less “ultra left.”

    And last, but not least, since the article is about gun control, here is Westnash on the 2nd Amendment:

    “Westnash says:
    January 8, 2013 at 8:00 am
    There will be some changes in gun regulations at some point in 2013 and the Republicans who only tow the NRA line of “no” will lose. Wouldn’t you rather outsmart your opponent than trying unsuccessfully in throwing up a wall, that is crumbling down around you.” I think that piece of Pinko propaganda speaks for itself.

    Westnash is a Pinko, which is the term for a Communist sympathizer.

    “Eat Mor Chikin!”, Westnash, LOL!

  6. Fed Up says:

    Westnash and euby:
    You two are becoming pains in the ass! Go out behind the barn and settle your differences. Comment on the posts and stop the juvenile bickering. It seems that you are both trying to shut down this site by driving the rest of us away. If you can’t engage without name calling and long rambling comments, ignore one another! Whatever you do, shut the hell up with your fights.

    THIS IS THE TOPIC:
    Barack Obama has now “deputized” doctors to snoop on law-abiding, gun-owning patients. In fact, the White House has now lent federal support to doctors’ groups trying to fight state efforts to protect gun owners’ privacy.

    Protect the rights of health care providers to talk to their patients about gun safety: Doctors and other health care providers also need to be able to ask about firearms in their patients’ homes and safe storage of those firearms, especially if their patients show signs of certain mental illnesses or if they have a young child or mentally ill family member at home. Some have incorrectly claimed that language in the Affordable Care Act prohibits doctors from asking their patients about guns and gun safety. Medical groups also continue to fight against state laws attempting to ban doctors from asking these questions. The Administration will issue guidance clarifying that the Affordable Care Act does not prohibit or otherwise regulate communication between doctors and patients, including about firearms.
    Read more on the Weekly Standard:
    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/obama-asks-doctors-help-deal-guns_696121.html

    • eubykdisop says:

      To quote you, Fed Up, “shut the hell up”!

      You neither own nor run this blog. If you don’t like what goes on here, you are free to leave. And don’t let the door hit you in the butt on the way out!

      Have a nice day, Fed Up!

    • Hunter says:

      Fed Up, I think most people following Seeing Red Arizona probably agree with you. At least I do.

      • eubykdisop says:

        I think most people don’t want a Pinko troll like Westnash continually spouting his Liberal propaganda in a Conservative Republican blog. The question is why you have chosen to not address it. Unless, of course, you are in agreement with the Liberal positions of Westnash. Are you, Hunter? Do you agree with this:

        “Westnash says:
        January 8, 2013 at 8:00 am
        There will be some changes in gun regulations at some point in 2013 and the Republicans who only tow the NRA line of “no” will lose. Wouldn’t you rather outsmart your opponent than trying unsuccessfully in throwing up a wall, that is crumbling down around you.”

        Regarding the 2nd Amendment, do you think that Conservative Republicans are “throwing up a wall, that is crumbling down around” us? Are we going to “lose” if we “tow the NRA line”? Do those sorts of comments represent a Conservative view to you or are they designed to get Conservatives to surrender to gun control? Do they not, in fact, constitute propaganda telling us that our efforts to keep our 2nd Amendment rights are futile?

        There is a war. There are battles in this war. One of the battlefields is here. I chose to stand and fight. I will call out Liberal propaganda whenever I see it, especially when Liberals like Westnash carry it into a Conservative Republican blog like “Seeing Red AZ”.

      • Hunter says:

        I don’t agree with Westnash’s political views except for the rare times he espouses conservative positions.

        I agree with many of your political views, but I don’t agree with all of them.

        Regardless of political views, I don’t appreciate people who make a regular practice of making rude remarks on blogs and hogging the blog real estate on a routine basis. Either one of those might be tolerable, but both together makes a blog less pleasant to read and participate in than it should be.

        Given the quantity of material you write and the research you do, you should actually consider starting your own blog. That would allow you to post useful items without having to depend on someone else to set up the primary topic. You would also be able to set policies regarding the participation of liberals that you would be able to enforce.

        It seems unlikely that Westnash could sustain a blog of his own. He might try posting on yours if you had one. ;-)

      • PJ O'Malley says:

        Hunter sees discussion and concludes that Euby should set up his own blog. Wrong. That is just a social engineering scheme to eliminate meaningful input. If everyone who had a dissenting view were to set up his own site, we would no longer be hashing issues with one another but spending time on our own. lonely, site maintenance. But SRA has been designed for exactly what Euby is doing, venting on conservative issues.
        If you don’t care about an issue, drop down to one that interests you, or begin your own thread. I’m enjoying the public tete a tete myself. go Euby!

      • eubykdisop says:

        All in all, a pretty balanced comment, Hunter!

        My statements about Westnash are based upon facts, verifiable and principally derived from his own written remarks, which I accurately quote. If that doesn’t sound “nice”, too bad. I’m not concerned with “nice”, I’m only concerned with “true”.

        As regards “hogging the blog real estate on an ongoing basis”, that is a mental construct which has no meaning in the real world. There is as much real estate as we need. We’re not in danger of running out of cyberspace.

        If it takes one sentence to refute Liberal propaganda, I’ll use one sentence. If it takes one hundred sentences to refute it, I’ll use one hundred sentences. In a blog like this we aren’t limited to the “sound bites” which we have become accustomed to hearing in the mainstream media. We have the time and space to fully express ideas and to make cogent arguments. That is part of why we are here. This isn’t the world of superficial snappy one-liners we so often hear during political campaigns. This is a place for thoughtful people who want substance.

        He, he! Got some good humor in there, Hunter! A little humor is always appreciated! :-)

      • eubykdisop says:

        P J O’Malley:

        Thanks a lot, PJ! Appreciate your support!

        “Ar scáth a chéile a mhaireann na daoine.”

      • PJ O'Malley says:

        I recognize Celtic but have ‘na’ any training in the delightful language. However it looks pretty, and I am honored, being 110% Irish!
        Something isn’t entirely right with this extended thread. The latest says it is a response from Euby to Hunter’s comments, but you were responding to mine, not Hunter’s. I think SRA might be sliding off the track a bit here.

      • eubykdisop says:

        “Ar scáth a chéile a mhaireann na daoine.” We live in each other’s shadows (shelter). Sort of like we survive by standing together and helping each other.

        Don’t know what’s going on with what you are seeing, PJ. Things appear on my puter in an entirely different format than what you describe.

      • PJ O'Malley says:

        Euby, thanks for that thought-provoking Celtic sentiment; it is so true.
        The confusion continues. In this post, SRA represents as how this was your response to Hunter, but you were addressing me. Perhaps SRA might investigate:

        “eubykdisop commented on Imperial Obama signs executive order restricting guns, ammo.

        in response to Hunter:
        Fed Up, I think most people following Seeing Red Arizona probably agree with you. At least I do.

        “Ar scáth a chéile a mhaireann na daoine.” We live in each other’s shadows (shelter). Sort of like we survive by standing together and helping each other.”
        Don’t know what’s going on with what you are seeing, PJ. Things appear on my puter in an entirely different format than what you describe.

    • Westnash says:

      I do agree with you and I also am fed up with it. It is an insult to receive the name calling and snipes from a mental midget about every post. Each person has a right to post what they think and if there was a lock on correctness the MM’s side would have actually won.

      I am not going to respond to any more back n forth and hope SRA can see what is occurring. I will continue to comment on threads as is the purpose of any blog.

      • Frankly Speaking says:

        Glad to hear that you will stop the name calling, and confine yourself to comments pertaining to the posts, although referencing a “mental midget” in your declaration is not a great start. Now I hope Euby will also give up on the personal slams and stick to commenting on the very important issues we are facing as a nation under seige. You are both obviously intelligent. I’ll bet if you weren’t anonymous, you’d both be more civil. If that’s impossible, just ignore one another.

      • eubykdisop says:

        Oh, you’re SO right, Westnash. I am actually a “mental midget”. You are the smart one. You are right. Please forgive me, Westnash.

      • eubykdisop says:

        Frankly Speaking:

        I have presented the positions of Westnash by quoting the comments he has actually written in this blog. Those are not “personal slams”, they are facts.

        You are hoplessly naive if you think that we can win this war by treating those on the left, like Westnash, with kid gloves. Clearly, you do not understand the “by any means necessary” approach of the Liberal left. You will, however, come to understand it. What you will not learn from me and others like me, who Westnash refers to as the “far right”, life itself will teach you the hard way.

        If you put being “nice” in this blog above the truth and hard, cold facts, you might as well get rid of your guns now because you don’t have the kind of steel which it is going to take to win this battle.

        Whether you realize it or not, your genteel treatment of Westnash constitutes giving aid and comfort to the enemy. We aren’t going to win this battle by doing that. If we are to win, we must confront the propaganda of Liberals like Westnash at every turn or lose as the result of being naive and actually facilitating our own demise.

        You’re a good man, Frankly Speaking, but I fear that you don’t know when it is appropriate and necessary to be as hard as a General Patton.

  7. Dennis O'Brien says:

    Today, Marxist King Obama approved TWENTY THREE executive orders and additional funding for mental health and school security while curtailing our Constitutional freedoms. Not a single thing he has advocated for would have stopped any of the massacres, but he surrounded himself with young children as shields for his power grab. Democrats should be as outraged as Republicans. This far exceeds any differences political adversaries might have had in the past. This is our future!

    • eubykdisop says:

      I believe that it’s going to backfire, Dennis, that Obama’s ego has caused him to miscalculate. Time will tell!

  8. Attila The Hunny says:

    Saw this on Drudge and thought I would pass it along.

    http://www.weeklystandard.com/blogs/dhs-expand-and-formalize-coordination-gun-control-efforts_696127.html

    Two points:
    1.Idiot Napolitano, who is in charge of the TSA will now enlarge the loss of our personal freedoms by inserting herself into gun control. Who knows where this will lead?!

    2. By expanding the “See something, say something” campaign, she will be encouraging Americans to snitch on law abiding gun owners. This is totally in line with Nazi Germany- people snitching on Jewish neighbors to the SS.The gauntlet has been thrown down and the move is on to make gun owners as hated as child molesters in the same way that traditional marriage advocates are now called bigots because they do not support marriage for 2% of our population.

    I hope to see MASSIVE civil disobedience on a level that will shock the Beltway and shut the mouth of every liberal in America. We have sat through having gay issues, including the indoctrination of our youth, rammed down our throats and liberal courts overturning the will of the people who voted against gay marriage. We have been forced to watch our debt rise and our health system wrecked. We see billions going overseas to countries who hate us, kidnap and kill our citizens and jail their own citizens for the audacity shown as they convert from Muslim to Christian. We have been forced to watch millions come into this country illegally and be called racist for resisting the takeover of our communities.

    Really, how far has this country sunk? I guess we will see the answer to that question soon enough

  9. Night Owl says:

    In his State of the State speech, Andrew Cuomo screamed out, “Forget the extremists!!”

    Shall we also forget the Bill of Rights?

    • eubykdisop says:

      That is the classic Liberal line, Night Owl, and it’s the same one which Westnash seeks to use when he tells us that the “far right” is costing Republicans elections. It’s nothing but Pinko propaganda designed to make radical leftists appear to be more powerful than they actually are. Consider this statement by the infamous leftist, Saul Alinksy:

      “Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.” – Saul Alinsky

      Liberals seek to make us think that they outnumber us and that they hold the center. That’s total bull! It’s just that Conservatives are more farsighted than the average person and so we have been more aware of the true nature of Liberals and where they want to take the country. But the “sleeping giant” is now beginning to wake up!

      As I have said before, we have Something which the Liberals do not have; God! It isn’t that God is on our side but rather that we are on God’s side. Liberals think that God is a myth but it is they who are the myth. We need to do our part 100% and God will do His part. We need to trust, and He who makes our hearts beat and who digests our food for us, without any concious effort on our part, will sustain us in carrying out His will! And it IS His will that The United States of America shall stand!

      • PJ O'Malley says:

        This makes eminent sense, Euby, and you are to be commended for shouting it like it is.

      • eubykdisop says:

        Thank you very much, PJ. Your support and your kind words are greatly appreciated by this Conservative and lover of God.

        The fact is, PJ, that, despite appearances, the primary focus of the assualt by the Liberal leftists is on the minds and hearts of Conservatives. They seek to make us falsely believe that we are losing and that we have already lost. Nothing could be further from the truth. It is a “big lie”.

        Liberals know that the ONLY way they can ever utimately prevail is if Conservatives throw in the towel. As long as we never surrender and keep fighting, they will be denied the ultimate victory they seek. That is why the entire thrust of their efforts is essentially to wage psychological warfare on us, seeking to demoralize and discourage us. They want us to surrender.

        To that, I offer that same reply that Brigadier General Anthony Clement McAuliffe offered to German General von Lüttwitz on December 22, 1944 during the Battle of the Bulge when von Lüttwitz proposed that McAuliffe surrender: “Nuts!”

      • Hunter says:

        It is like something Ayn Rand wrote about. She said that collectivists don’t just want to victimize productive people. They want the sanction of their victims. They won’t stop beating up on conservatives until the conservatives acknowledge the moral justification of the leftist positions. It is like in the novel 1984 where the state not only requires the compliance of its subjects; it requires that they believe that the tyranny of the state is justified – even if they are just going to be executed once they succumb.

        Rand and Orwell wrote some insightful novels. I don’t agree politically with them on everything (or perhaps even most things outside of evils of big government), but they presented some great insights into the nature of tyranny.

        The old saying, “In history, nothing is true except names and dates. In fiction, everything is true except names and dates,” shows that cliches usually do have a basis in reality.

      • eubykdisop says:

        Interesting thoughts, Hunter!

      • PJ O'Malley says:

        I’m losing track of how SRA is arranging responses. It seems the format is to name the person who has just posted, tell who he is addressing, and present his post. But the following says Euby is responding to Hunter, but does not give hunter’s remarks but instead gives an earlier response from Euby himself to Night Owl. I don’t think this is clicking.

        “eubykdisop commented on Imperial Obama signs executive order restricting guns, ammo.

        in response to eubykdisop:

        That is the classic Liberal line, Night Owl, and it’s the same one which Westnash seeks to use when he tells us that the “far right” is costing Republicans elections. It’s nothing but Pinko propaganda designed to make radical leftists appear to be more powerful than they actually are. Consider this statement by the infamous [...]

        Interesting thoughts, Hunter!”

  10. Westnash says:

    It seems that the E/Orders were mostly of the kind big government loves…data collection and research that may end up going to outside contractors (cost plus) and will result in more paperwork….whether any infringe on rights is not clear. I am all for an end to any loopholes in gun registration and all for some way to ascertain whether a person is mentally ill and should not buy a gun. As stated, it might not have stopped Newtown but there is no way that kid should have had access to his mother’s legally owned guns. Gun Safe business is the one which should be booming.

    • dubykdisop says:

      Your Liberal position is not at all surprising given this statement by you, Westnash:

      “Westnash says:
      January 8, 2013 at 8:00 am
      There will be some changes in gun regulations at some point in 2013 and the Republicans who only tow the NRA line of “no” will lose. Wouldn’t you rather outsmart your opponent than trying unsuccessfully in throwing up a wall, that is crumbling down around you.” I think that piece of Pinko propaganda speaks for itself.

      You also gave this as an example of being “far right”, which you say is causing Republicans to lose elections:

      “Refusing to compromise on Gun Laws in wake of the recent shootings and publicity.”

      No, Westnash, we are not buying your Pinko propaganda that we are unsuccessfully throwing up a wall which is crumbling down around us. That’s Liberal bull! Neither are we going to “compromise” on gun laws as you and Obama would like us to. We are going to fight and that fight starts right here, right now with exposing you for the Pinko that you are.

    • eubykdisop says:

      Oh, you’re absolutely right, Westnash. And you’re also right that large capacity magazines should be banned. There’s no reason for them at all.

      Yes, Westnash, we need to compromise on gun control in the wake of the Newtown shootings, just as you have so wisely stated.

      We have, as you have said, been unsuccessfully trying to throw up a wall on gun control which is crumbling down around us. You have made me see the light.

      I am now a devoted follower of yours and will support you in all of your positions. I hope that will make SRAZ happy.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 320 other followers