Obama regime emulates world’s most tyrannical

Repressive despots have long exploited innocence

Hitler_using_children_as_props              Obama_using_children_as_props

Using school children as propaganda props is a predictable device employed by the left. They were cunningly exploited yesterday as a ruthless Barack Obama brazenly signed his expansive curtailment of America’s constitutional freedoms — while bypassing congress — to announce 23 executive actions curbing sales of guns and ammunition.

Included in Obama’s overreach “for the children” is his coziness with the liberal leadership of the American Medical Association and the American Academy of Pediatrics — long filled with notorious gun-grabbers. The Weekly Standard details how he has deputized doctors to “help” snoop on law-abiding, gun-owning patients. In fact, the White House has now lent federal support to doctors’ groups trying to fight state efforts to protect gun owners’ privacy: Political malpractice hand-in-glove with medical malpractice in the name of saving children is nothing short of a recipe for authoritarianism. We previously covered Obama’s photo ops using MDs as props for his socialization of our health care here and here where Scottsdale Dr. Susan Wilder, a Democrat,  was a willing shill.

For a well researched pictorial essay, shocking in its comprehensive overview,  we invite you to check out “How Dictators Kiss Babies,” by James Thomas Snyder. He shows Stalin, Vladimir Putin, Mao Tse-tung, Nicolai Ceausescu, and members of North Korea’s Kim Dynasty, setting the stage for Obama’s photo op.

“They’re common-sense measures,” Obama declared as he claimed, “They have the support of the majority of the American people.”

Really? Were you polled?

About these ads

23 Responses to Obama regime emulates world’s most tyrannical

  1. Kathy says:

    Would you expect anything else from this coward??? Afterall he voted twice to kill babies who actually survived an abortion while an IL Senator!!!! Of course, he uses children – he only sees them as props.

    • Ajo Joe says:

      An excellent point, Kathy! As a member of the Illinois state legislature, Obama was the ONLY member to vote in favor of withholding medical care from babies born alive during a botched abortion. He is a stunning liar and fraud, who is perpetrating a colossal deception on the semi-conscious and intentionally undereducated (by the left-wing education unions) American public. At least two generations have been lulled into complacency by their governmental benefits, sports, and mind numbing, indoctrinating TV. It’s reminiscent of the fall of the Roman empire, with their government provided bread, beer and circuses to lull them into oblivion as their nation crumbled around them.

  2. Kimball says:

    Yes, the education establishment is to blame. But so are parents who are willing to abandon their roles to others. And let’s not forget the Republican party that has given us less than stellar candidates like John McCain and Bob Dole. Mitt Romney had my vote, but I found myself screaming at the TV, begging him to be more aggressive. Ronald Reagan was never reticent to articulate the conservative message and he not only won, but was reelected, despite being marginalized by the liberals as merely “an actor.” He was, without a doubt, the best president in my lifetime. Not just because I’m a Republican, but because of his ability to turn this country around (with good humor and a firm belief in God) after the debasement of Jimmy Carter’s term.

  3. eubykdisop says:

    The above article is a perfect example of the extremism of the far right wing of the Republican Party, the wing which has been causing Republicans to lose election after election after election.

    President Obama was duly elected by the majority of the American people and, after experiencing four years of his wise leadership, they chose him to provide another four years of selfless service to his country. Get over it!

    It is the greatest disrespect to the Office of the President of The United States of America to liken Obama to Adolf Hitler. While our troops are at war in places like Afghanistan, it is treasonous to undermine the Commander in Chief of the armed forces of The United States.

    It is the height of hypocrisy for the extreme far right to constantly whine about abortion on demand while, at the same time, wanting to keep their guns after the mass slaughter of school children at Sandy Hook school in Newtown, CT. But don’t worry, I have a solution which will please the wingers. We will still have abortion on demand but aborted fetuses will be finally dispatched by two shots from an assault rifle. That should keep the far right wing extremists happy!

    Gun control is a done deal. It’s over. The gun nuts have lost. Move on.

    • Sally Forth says:

      Huh? Have you lost your mind or are you smoking something stronger than Marlboros? The analogy is perfect!

      • eubykdisop says:

        Refute my arguments. These are the arguments made, even in this blog, by Liberals like Westnash. If you can’t refute Liberal propaganda here, you won’t be able to refute it anywhere else either. Shred the propaganda… if you can!

        I am very well versed in the tactics and strategies of Liberal leftists like Westnash. I can take up their side and defend it, using Pinko methods. Come get me and let’s see how you do!

      • eubykdisop says:

        ROFL! Look what Westnash wrote below:

        “Comparing Obama to Hitler only makes Republicans look like kooks.”

        And here is what I wrote in my above Pinko spoof:

        “It is the greatest disrespect to the Office of the President of The United States of America to liken Obama to Adolf Hitler.”

        Did I nail it, or what, LOL!

  4. Westnash says:

    Comparing Obama to Hitler only makes Republicans look like kooks. No doubt Barry Obama would love to take away everyone’s guns but it simply isnt going to happen. Reagan would not have compared Obama to either Stalin or Hitler….perhaps McCarthy would have…one was a winner…one was a loser. Even Harry Reid is not likely to propose any real changes in the gun laws.

    • Kent says:

      The comparison had to do with the use of children as props. Did you bother to look at the “How Dictators Kiss Babies” website link? It’s doubtful since all you seem to want to do is pompously bloviate and suck the oxygen out of the room. Reading anything other than your own words is too cumbersome for you, since you have all the answers. I join the others getting tired of you and your tiresome tirades. Take a nap.

      • westnash says:

        Actually I did read it and am familiar with those characters and many of the pictures. While we should see Obama for who he is, this author’s thesis hardly applies. Now you can return to talk radio.

      • eubykdisop says:

        Westnash wrote: “While we should see Obama for who he is…”

        Who is he, Westnash?

    • eubykdisop says:

      What was that? McCarthy, you say?

      “In his famous speech on February 9th, 1950, McCarthy brought public a list of 57 known communists working for the state department. These revelations took the American public by storm. Out of all the Senators and public figures in Washington, only McCarthy had the courage to stand up against communist infiltration. It was a deed that McCarthy’s leftist critics would never forgive him for.”

      “He was noted for claiming that there were large numbers of Communists and Soviet spies and sympathizers, engaged in a conspiracy to undermine the United States, inside the federal government. He was proven correct by government documents and inquiry, including decrypted Venona files.”

      What are the Venona files?

      “The Venona project intercepted codes passed among agents of the communist Soviet Union during World War II, and attempted to decrypt them.”

      “After the collapse of the Soviet Union, documents from the KGB and Comintern Archives in Moscow became available to researchers and the public for the first time, corroborating the facts of McCarthy’s underlying premise.”

      The Moynihan Secrecy Commission stated that:

      “The first fact is that a significant Communist conspiracy was in place in Washington, New York, and Los Angeles, but in the main those involved systematically denied their involvement.”

      Hayden Peake, curator of the Central Intelligence Agency’s Historical Intelligence Collection has stated, “No modern government was more thoroughly penetrated.”

      Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan, Chairman of the bipartisan Commission on Government Secrecy, responsible for securing the release of Venona project materials, in the Introduction to his book Secrecy states, “The Venona intercepts contained overwhelming proof of the activities of Soviet spy networks in America, complete with names, dates, places, and deeds.”

      “Over 200 named or covernamed persons found in the Venona translations, persons then present in the U.S., are claimed by the KGB and the GRU in their messages as their clandestine assets or contacts.”

      Now remember, Westnash, that’s decorated combat veteran, U. S. Senator Joesph McCarthy, who enlisted in the Marines at the start of WWII even though, as a judge, he was exempt from military service.

      • Hunter says:

        If you read the Venona intercepts and Whitaker Chambers’ book Witness, you get a really clear idea of how badly the United States government was infiltrated by Communists. Not only that, but liberals protected them. One need only look at the case of Alger Hiss to see how this worked. There are many liberals who still think he was a loyal American who never spied for the Soviet Union or used his position to push US policies in a direction favorable to communists.

        There are amazing parallels to how we are dealing with Islamofacism. We have people with Muslim Brotherhood links at the highest levels of the government. When this is pointed out, liberals attack those who point out a possible problem and defend those with questionable links.

        I suspect that, just as there was a debate over who lost China to communists, there will be a debate over who lost the Middle East to Islamofacists. There is a saying that those who don’t learn history are doomed to repeat its mistakes. Sometimes, though, I wonder if people at the highest levels of our government have learned from history how to deliberately pervert US policy to lose the Middle East to Islamofacists. There have been so many bad decisions made it is almost impossible to believe they are all by random chance: Bengazi, Egypt coming under the Muslim Brotherhood, failure to support people opposing the Mullahs in Iran, abandoning Iraq militarily to the point it is becoming aa Shiite surrogate for Iran, Egypt being allowed to let the Iranian Navy use the Suez Canal while still retaining US aid and military assistance, etc.

      • eubykdisop says:

        That’s a really substantial and meaty comment, Hunter!

        The answer to the “mystery”, Hunter, is that it is a closed loop! What appear to be disparate parts are actually different aspects of the same single organism!

        “A new Cold War”

        “Exclusive: Former Soviet-bloc spy chief reveals secret puppet-master behind Islamic radicalism”

        “Published: 09/23/2012 at 5:14 PM”

        “by Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa”

        “Editor’s note: Lt. Gen. Ion Mihai Pacepa is the highest-ranking Soviet-bloc official ever to defect to the West.”

        “My past experience at the top of the Soviet bloc intelligence community gives me solid ground to state that the Muslim attacks on U.S. embassies and the assassination of our ambassador to Libya, carried out with Soviet-made rocket-propelled grenades, Kalashnikovs and Molotov cocktails, were just as “spontaneous” as the May Day parades in Moscow – and that they have the same organizers.”

        “The KGB boss described the Muslim world as a waiting petri dish, in which we could nurture a strain of hate-America, grown from the bacterium of Marxist-Leninist thought. Islamic anti-Semitism ran deep, he said. The Muslims had a taste for nationalism, jingoism and victimology, and their illiterate, oppressed mobs could easily be whipped up to a fever pitch. We had only to keep repeating, over and over, that the United States was a war-mongering, Zionist country anxious to take over the whole world.”

        http://www.wnd.com/2012/09/a-brand-new-cold-war/

      • eubykdisop says:

        In other words, Hunter, the inside is the outside and the outside is the inside. There really is no outside or inside. Those are just mental constructs. They are one and the same thing.

        Obama wants a Marxist America. Russians want a Marxist America. Obama facilitates radical Islam from inside the White House. The Russians, on the outside, bring about the attack in Benghazi. But the inside and the outside are actually part of the same Marxist agenda.

        All of what appear to be discrete dots are actually connected and constitute an unbroken continuum. What appear to be contradictions and logical inconsistencies fall away once we perceive the unifying agenda behind them all.

        So, yes, there is a deliberate perversion of U. S. policy. It is not random chance.

    • Hunter says:

      Maybe we should compare Obama to Hugo Chavez instead?

  5. eubykdisop says:

    …and here it comes!

    “Holder Begs Court to Stop Document Release on Fast and Furious”

    “Attorney General Eric Holder and his Department of Justice have asked a federal court to indefinitely delay a lawsuit brought by watchdog group Judicial Watch. The lawsuit seeks the enforcement of open records requests relating to Operation Fast and Furious, as required by law.”

    “Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said that Holder’s and Obama’s desire to continually hide these Fast and Furious documents is “ironic” now that they’re so gung-ho on gun control. “It is beyond ironic that the Obama administration has initiated an anti-gun violence push as it seeking to keep secret key documents about its very own Fast and Furious gun walking scandal,” Fitton said in a statement.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/01/17/Holder-begs-court-to-indefinitely-delay-group-s-lawsuit-fighting-for-release-of-Obama-s-executive-privilege-Fast-and-Furious-documents

  6. Orion says:

    We’re screwed.. Obama cares not a whit for the Rule of Law or our Constitution. Liberty is meaningless to this Marxist. The fact that Democrats fall in line with this overt power grab, sidestepping congress, is unfathomable. Even they should be able to see what is ahead for their own families. Is their own standing within the party more important? it appears so.
    I’m beyond shocked. I’m disgusted.

    • eubykdisop says:

      No, Orion, we’re not screwed, LOL! The Liberals want us to THINK that we’re screwed. That’s the principal point of all of their efforts. Don’t fall into the trap of that sort of thinking. THEN they HAVE won!

      Wrong paradigm, Orion. It’s not about the standing of Democrats within their party. It’s about implementing the “New World Order” in which they have been promised a position among the ruling elites.

      None of what is going on will make any sense at all unless folks get it about the “New World Order”. So, stay clueless or get on top of it! ;-)

  7. CD9 says:

    Seeing Red, I know you must have an email to contact people that we will not know who you are. I need to ask you something important. It is very troubling. ether email me or call me. I think you will want to investigate.

    • Seeing Red AZ says:

      CD9,
      Since your comments are approved to go up automatically, and are not held in moderation, write whatever you care to share in a comment using a name other than CD9. We will see your message. Be sure to use the same email address. No one else will see it. Please give verification for whatever information you send.

  8. eubykdisop says:

    Even the Liberal “New York Times” admits that Obama’s gun proposals are a crock:

    “NY Times: Obama’s Gun Ban Wouldn’t Have Prevented Newtown”

    “by AWR Hawkins18 Jan 2013, 2:05 AM PDT”

    “The NYT explained their position by reminding readers that the gun Lanza used conformed to the strict ‘assault weapons’ law in Conn. and that background checks were already in place, but Lanza went around them by stealing his gun.”

    http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Journalism/2013/01/17/NYT-Assault-Weapons-Ban-Expanded-Background-Checks-Would-Not-Have-Prevented-Sandy-Hook

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 339 other followers