Barack Obama Sr. forced to leave Harvard due to lies, womanizing

A good number of U.S.Presidents grew up in less than idyllic households. Bill Clinton’s name at birth was William Jefferson Blythe, III. His father is said to have died before his birth and his mother married five times. One of her husbands adopted the young president-to-be, and his name was changed.  Reagan’s father was an abusive alcoholic. Gerald Ford’s father abandoned him at birth and he was adopted by his mother’s second husband who changed his name from Leslie Lynch, Jr.

But in 1964, when Harvard administrators wrote a memo to the Immigration and Naturalization Service to delay a request by Barack Hussein Obama Sr. to extend his stay in the U.S., the administrators, wrote they “were having difficulty with his financial arrangements and couldn’t seem to figure out how many wives he had.”  His request was denied.

Now that makes all of the other sordid life tales pale by comparison!

Read the complete Boston Herald article here.

11 Responses to Barack Obama Sr. forced to leave Harvard due to lies, womanizing

  1. Steve Calabrese says:

    Yeah, the revelation that Obama’s father was basically an illegal alien should be interesting.

    • Maggie says:

      You’re right about that, Steve. Obama’s entire murky past makes his eligibility as president suspect.

      And if you check the dates on his birth certificate, it’s apparent his adult father was the statutory rapist of his teenage mother. No doubt that was something Obama (as a knowledgeable lawyer)wanted concealed.

      I’m no fan of Donald Trump, but I thank him for forcing the birth certificate issue and asking the correct questions about Obama’s questionable univerity transcripts.

  2. TeaPartyPatriot says:

    Like father, like son – the rotten apple doesn’t fall far from the perverse tree.

    How did mediocre student “You Lie!” hussein get into hAHrvAHrd ?

    Here’s how: AFFIRMATIVE ACTION SPECIAL TREATMENT – which let him in and rejected BETTER ACADEMICALLY QUALIFIED CANDIDATES because they were not the PREFERRED COLOR to meet an arbitrary QUOTA. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION is the lunatic-left d-crat socialist endorsed formed of DISCRIMINATION. IT IS WRONG and IT IS DESPICABLE.

    Now, isn’t that the American Way: “We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal…” — with the addendum provided by the lunatic-left — “…except when PREFERENCE is given for those who always vote for d-crat socialists.”

    FYI: Once again, Arizona leads the nation in stopping d-crat socialist extremism with its Proposition 107 that was on the ballot for Nov 2010, and was overwhelmingly approved by the voters. Prop 107 OUTLAWS Affirmative Action Special Treatment for anybody.

    Guess which group was adamantly OPPOSED to Prop 107? Yep, you guessed it: the National Association for the Advancement of (Socialist) Colored People! (Naturally, those racist Tea Partiers supported it.)

  3. TeaPartyPatriot says:

    “Report: Documents Suggest Barack Obama’s Father Was Forced To Leave Harvard”

    Naturally, that makes him even more loved by the lunatic-left d-crat socialists. Remember, their hero ted “the drunk who murdered mary jo kopechne” kennedy was thrown out of hAHrvAHrd for CHEATING. The d-crat socialists considered it an HONOR for a lunatic-leftist to be booted from hAHrvAHrd for any despicable act.

  4. Vince says:

    That’s quite a damning report in the Boston Herald — a newspaper not known for a conservative bent. Thanks for this. we sure don’t see such information in the AZ Repugnant.

  5. Sigmund Freud says:

    In my considered opinion, we Americans have been screwed by this fraud. And it appears the fraud is generational.

  6. Ginger says:

    Great “roots” on that exotic Nairobi Obama tree.

  7. Marianne says:

    After reading the linked article in the Boston paper and seeing the accompanying photo of Papa Obama, its readily apparent why all the girls at Harvard were falling for him. What a handsome heart throb!!! No wonder he was unable to give an accurate accounting of his wives. I get it now!

    • Tyler M says:


      You crack me up. I’m not sure if you’re being serious, but I don’t think that I’ll ever quite understand what women find physically attractive in men in the first place.

      One thing for sure though, although I abhor his far-left socialist policies today, I do feel bad for a young Obama to have had a father who would act like this to him & his mother. I’m not sure if it was an acceptable cultural thing in his native Kenya, but the way he treated them was unacceptable here in the US.

      The book “Obama-Nation” by Jerome Corsi goes into further details about how bad of a person Obama’s father was or became. In it, it talks about how he married another woman while at Harvard & brought her back to Kenya with him. He also apparently had not told that woman about his other wives. While his wife from the Harvard area was in Kenya with Obama Sr, he beat her often & she found out about the Kenyan wife that he already had. As the “Boston Herald” article mentions, his life deteriorated.

      According to Corsi’s book, Obama Sr. had a very bad automobile accident while driving drunk which amputated both of his legs. Sometime soon after that, Obama Sr. was involved in another automobile accident which took his life. If I remember correctly, Corsi suggests that Obama Sr. actually committed suicide by automobile. He apparently tried to get himself killed on purpose while while driving drunk again.

  8. Angie says:

    I’m just curious to know who got the millions for creating such a birth certificate? The CIA, the
    FBI or Homeland In-Security? It took them two years to do it before they all get thrown, out, fired or
    impeached? I’m sure this too will come out.

  9. azgo says:

    Thanks for the insight into Barack Obama Sr.’s girls-girls-girls dealings.

    As one of the many historical references points out, Supreme Court Justice Waite with a unanimous concurring court has told us;

    “…it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens.”

    As we know, the 2008/2012 Democratic presidential candidate’s father was never a citizen of the United States and only a student with permission to attend our educational institutions in this country.

    Check this out! Another paid political ad, only this time by the Democratic National Committee.

    The ad is not claiming ‘native citizen’ this time but merely claiming simple basic American citizenship.

    The ad displays an image which purports to be the 2012 Democratic candidate’s birth certificate and as the ad depicts, the birth certificate issue is a fake controversy regarding the candidate’s American citizenship which was a conspiracy theory and a distraction to the more important issues.

    Of course, as we know the computer image is simply a reproduced visual imitation of an alleged “certified copy of the original Certificate of Live Birth” as allegedly delivered by Judith Corley of the Perkins, Coie law firm and, as an important side note, the alleged “certified copy” was strangely missing at the April 27th press conference for any type of inspection and examination to further identify a genuine “identification document” with the proper “authentication features”.

    U.S. Code § 1028 (d) defines “authentication feature[s]” and “identification document”.

    “(1) the term “authentication feature” means any hologram, watermark, certification, symbol, code, image, sequence of numbers or letters, or other feature that either individually or in combination with another feature is used by the issuing authority on an identification document, document-making implement, or means of identification to determine if the document is counterfeit, altered, or otherwise falsified;

    (3) the term “identification document” means a document made or issued by or under the authority of …, a State, …, when completed with information concerning a particular individual, is of a type intended or commonly accepted for the purpose of identification of individuals;”—-000-.html

    A computer image and reproduced copies handed out to the press cannot possibly reveal those special physical authentication features unique to each different state.

    And only to say, we further now know that there is nothing in the public record which proves the 2008/2012 presidential candidate is a natural born citizen, not even this new political communication.

    And they absolutely know this. Their so called theme of proved American citizenship seems only to be a mirror deflecting the real issue of natural born citizenship.

    This communication ad meets U.S. Code, Disclosure Of Federal Campaign Funds, § 441d. Publication and distribution of statements and solicitations;

    “(3) if not authorized by a candidate, an authorized political committee of a candidate, or its agents, shall clearly state the name and permanent street address, telephone number, or World Wide Web address of the person who paid for the communication and state that the communication is not authorized by any candidate or candidate’s committee.”—d000-.html

    And yet less than four days ago, the 2012 presidential candidate basically said, “This is my birth certificate…”, “This is my birth certificate…”.
    …How confusing is this to the ‘not so knowledgeable’ person when the candidate himself cannot even authorize the communication.

    I’m going to say, since the candidate didn’t pay for the communication, then the candidate doesn’t get to authorize the political ad about himself. Laws written for political activities are sometimes funny things.

%d bloggers like this: