Obowma: Subservient again

Obama’s tour of Southeast Asia included mocking greeting from Cambodian First Lady

Investor’s Business Daily runs an editorial titled:Obama’s Southeast Asia Trip All Style, No Substance. The complete and harsh appraisal is well worth reading. We’ll tantalize you with this brief two paragraph summation:

“No substance, no influence. Nothing underlined this quite like the lack of crowds greeting Obama in all three nations. When a leader’s visit is cause for hope and a catalyst for change — think Pope John Paul II’s 1978 Poland visit — crowds turn out. Obama, supposedly representing the greatest nation on earth, couldn’t draw so much as an Occupy-sized crowd. Nor did he draw respect.

On his trip to Cambodia, a country he claimed didn’t deserve a visit due to its strongman government, first lady Bun Rany greeted Obama with a traditional “sampeah” pressed-hands greeting reserved for servants, a little dig that was probably lost on him but not to Asians. So what is really Obama’s tour about? Apparently a get-out-of-town photo-op all about himself as a means of avoiding pressing problems back home. The Asians deserve better — and so do the Americans.”

Read IBD’s editorial in full here.  UK’s Daily Mail cuts Obowma even less slack, questing whether he was mocked by Cambodia’s First Lady.

Seeing Red AZ has documented many of this subservient fool’s deferential greetings to Muslim royals, dictators from repressive Communist regimes, emperors, despots and even a mayor.

14 Responses to Obowma: Subservient again

  1. Sam Aritan says:

    What an embarrassment! Obama is intent on diminishing America.

  2. Sgt. Preston says:

    The cartoon says it all! Glad to know there are some political cartoonists who have sense. AZ’s Steve Benson is a far left leaner.

  3. Maggie says:

    Hasn’t Obowma ever heard that American presidents don’t bow? Obviously he thinks we are second rate to third-world rulers, Buddhists and of course, Muslims.

  4. eubykdisop says:

    Obama is working to implement “One World” and the “New World Order”. So we shouldn’t be at all surprised by behaviors which are harmonious with that objective!

    In order for the “New World Order” to come into being, The United States of America, as it was founded and as we have known it, must cease to exist. “One World” and American constitutional liberties and sovereignty are at odds with each other and are, in fact, mutually exclusive.

    Every action which Obama has taken has been aimed directly at the destruction of America as it was founded and as we have known it. Illegal immigration, same-sex “marriage”, abortion, Obamacare, taxing the prosperous, the HHS mandates, our international relations with Jihadist nations and all of Obama’s other abominations are united by the common thread of taking us to the “One World”, “New World Order” where the United Nations will govern the world, including the former United States of America.

    • American Patriot says:

      You’re right again! As a onservative, I despised Dubya Bush for his open borders, one world policies that his ‘Manchurian Candidate’ father first began implementing. Papa Bush was the US Ambassador to the United Nations AND envoy to China, and learned every trick in the trade to undercut the USA

      • eubykdisop says:

        Thank you very much, American Patriot!

        I’m overjoyed to see that you are aware of the situation and hope that, like Paul Revere, you will help to spread the word that “One World” is coming, unless we act to stop it!

  5. eubykdisop says:

    The “One World” agenda has been around for a long time but the implementation, beginning with the “North American Union”, was taken up strongly at the level of the U. S. president beginning with the G. W. Bush administration and is continuing on, in a different guise, under the Obama administration.

    The first step is to make Mexico, Canada and the U. S. a single geopolitical entity. The implementation with Mexico is outlined in this policy statement from the U. S. Department of State:

    “United States-Mexico Partnership: A New Border Vision”

    “Mexico and the United States have a shared interest in creating a 21st century border that promotes the security and prosperity of both countries. The U.S. and Mexican governments have launched a range of initiatives that challenge the traditional view of “hold the line” and are developing a framework for a new vision of 21st century border management.”


  6. eubykdisop says:

    The implementation with Canada is mentioned here:

    “Obama quietly erasing borders”

    “Dem administration advancing ‘North American Union’ agenda”

    “CTV News reported that the draft declaration of “A New Border Vision” with Canada similarly also specified a cross-border policy agenda…”


  7. eubykdisop says:

    Most of us are aware of the plethora of anti-Amrican treaties being promoted by the United Nations and the support for those treaties by the Obama administration. But the United Nations is moving on other fronts to consolidate it’s power for world governance:

    “United Nations: Give Us Drones!”

    “Kate Hicks
    Web Editor, Townhall.com”

    “Well this is fun: the U.N. looks like it’s attempting its own military build up, now expressing interest in procuring drones from member countries. Ostensibly for purposes of monitoring the situation in the DRC, the drones would nevertheless represent a new frontier in terms of the international body’s available powers.”


  8. Doc says:

    SRA: Off topic but on point THIS from Mark Levin-

    We conservatives, we do not accept bipartisanship in the pursuit of tyranny. Period. We will not negotiate the terms of our economic and political servitude. Period. We will not abandon our child to a dark and bleak future. We will not accept a fate that is alien to the legacy we inherited from every single future generation in this country. We will not accept social engineering by politicians and bureaucrats who treat us like lab rats, rather than self-sufficient human beings. There are those in this country who choose tyranny over liberty. They do not speak for us, 57 million of us who voted against this yesterday, and they do not get to dictate to us under our Constitution.

    We are the alternative. We will resist. We’re not going to surrender to this. We will not be passive, we will not be compliant in our demise. We’re not good losers, you better believe we’re sore losers! A good loser is a loser forever. Now I hear we’re called ‘purists.’ Conservatives are called purists. The very people who keep nominating moderates, now call us purists the way the left calls us purists. Yeah, things like liberty, and property rights, individual sovereignty, and the Constitution, and capitalism. We’re purists now. And we have to hear this crap from conservatives, or pseudo-conservatives, Republicans.

  9. eubykdisop says:


    Here’s something to keep in mind.

    They have the mainstream media. They have the bully pulpit of the presidency. They have the help of stab-in-the-back, traitorous “Republicans”. But we have something they don’t have; God!

    It isn’t that God is on our side. It’s that we are on God’s side!

    “Thou preparest a table before me in the presence of mine enemies.”