Disarming! The hypocrisy of Barry “bang-bang” Obama


New-found friend of sportsmen and hunters

In this recently released White House photo, we see obsessed gun-restrictor Barack Obama on August 4, 2012, shooting clay targets at Camp David, the presidential retreat in Maryland.

Like any good liberal hypocrite, Obama has signed a law giving himself armed guards for life. He and Michelle send their daughters to exclusive Sidwell Friends, the costly private Quaker school in Washington, DC, which has 11 security officers, in addition to Secret Service protection provided the First Family’s girls. The guards are standard operating procedure for the school attended by children of privileged politicians, television news anchors and other influential liberal parents.  You know them. They and their cohorts are the ones who want to disarm the rest of us.

As Obama postures in an attempt to show his sensitivity to gun owners — even as he attempts to disarm us — let’s keep in mind the fundamental issue behind the Second Amendment. Our nation’s Founders were concerned about far more than skeet shooting or hunting. Carrying concealed was certainly not on their radar.

The Second Amendment is about our right to keep and bear arms as a bulwark against tyranny.


12 Responses to Disarming! The hypocrisy of Barry “bang-bang” Obama

  1. eubykdisop says:

    It would seem that today, an armed citizenry is a “bulwark against tyranny” only if armed with fully automatic, military grade weapons and an enormous supply of ammunition!

    “DHS adds another 200,000 rounds to its 2 billion round stockpile”

    “January 4, 2013”

    “Last year, it was reported that the Department of Homeland Security had purchased 1.6 billion rounds of hollow point ammunition of various calibers for reasons that the agency refuses to reveal. On Wednesday, the DHS announced that it would acquire another 200,000 rounds from a company known as Evian Group, Inc..”

    “Not only is the reason for the agency’s stockpiling of nearly 2 billion rounds of ammo shrouded in mystery, but so too is the Evian Group.”


    “If ‘Assault Weapons’ Are Bad…Why Does DHS Want to Buy 7,000 of Them for ‘Personal Defense’?”

    “Jan. 26, 2013 2:30pmJason Howerton”

    “The Department of Homeland Security is seeking to acquire 7,000 5.56x45mm NATO “personal defense weapons” (PDW) — also known as “assault weapons” when owned by civilians. The solicitation, originally posted on June 7, 2012, comes to light as the Obama administration is calling for a ban on semi-automatic rifles and high capacity magazines.”

    “Citing a General Service Administration (GSA) request for proposal (RFP), Steve McGough of RadioViceOnline.com reports that DHS is asking for the 7,000 “select-fire” firearms because they are “suitable for personal defense use in close quarters.” The term select-fire means the weapon can be both semi-automatic and automatic. Civilians are prohibited from obtaining these kinds of weapons.”


    • Westnash says:

      Euby, as usual much of this is nonsensical. Because the DHS needs full auto weapons, does that give your ok for the nut in Tucson and in CT to run and buy one? Of course not. Does it mean a hunter needs one? Of course not. You failed to mention full auto weapons have been mostly illegal since the 1930s for civilians. A good shooter can fire a semi auto or even a pump action as fast as is necessary.

      I am more upset that the govt. needs to spend our money on 7,000 more weapons for any DHS needs. They probably have a warehouse full now and this just makes the manufacturers richer.

      Same is true for the ammo and it would be interesting to see which legislators got lobbying money from the Evian group.

      • eubykdisop says:

        Hey, Einstein, let me walk you through this.

        The article speaks of a “bulwark against tyranny”. Who is it who would be enforcing tyranny? Well, Obama’s DHS has purchased almost TWO BILLION rounds of hollow point ammunition and is seeking to purchase 7,0000 “assault” rifles which can fire in fully automatic mode.

        Now, DHS is NOT the military BUT it has 22 domestic agencies under it’s control. Against whom would it use TWO BILLION rounds of hollow point ammunition and 7,000, fully automatic capable “assault weapons”? Since DHS is NOT the military, what is the “chain of command” which could order it into action?

        What is the track record of DHS in following the law? ICE agents currently have a lawsuit against DHS for actually ORDERING them to violate federal law. That lawsuit also makes the case that DHS is implementing, under wrongly applied “prosecutorial discretion”, the mass provision of benefits to illegal aliens which need to be authorized by an act of Congress but which have not been so authorized.

        Furthermore, the Obama administration executed “Fast and Furious”, which put military grade weapons in the hands of Mexican criminal cartels, resulting in the deaths of up to 300 people, including two U. S. law enforcement officers.

        Despite the finding by a U. S. Court of Appeals that Obama’s “recess” appointments to the NLRB are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, the NLRB has said that it will continue to issue rulings. Despite that fact that a federal court has ordered that the EPA may NOT require the use of biofuels which do not exist, the EPA just INCREASED the requirements for the nonexistent biofuels.

        So what do we have here, my Liberal friend?

        We have a non-military domestic agency, part of the executive branch of government, which has stockpiled TWO BILLION rounds of hollow point ammuntion and is seeking to purchase 7,000 fully automatic capable “assault” rifles. That agency has violated, ordered to be violated and failed to comply with federal law. It is under the control of B. Hussein Obama and Janet Napolitano who have ignored BOTH the law AND court rulings.

        We have an administration which engaged in “gun walking” resulting in the actual violent murders of 200 to 300 people through the use of military grade firearms. Not one person has been held accountable under the law for those deaths and Holder and Obama continue to stonewall the efforts of Congress to gather the facts and hold individuals accountable.

        Now, what was that you were concerned about, Westnash?

      • Doc says:

        euby…you’re wasting your time with this person. Trying to explain the reason for the 2nd Amendment to him is like trying to get our legislators to DO SOMETHING…

      • eubykdisop says:

        Hi, Doc! :-)

        My interest is not in Westnash, Doc, but rather in those who read this blog and are exposed to his Liberal propaganda. Not everyone who reads this blog may be a knowledgeable Conservative, Doc, and so could be susceptible to and influenced by his Saul Alinsky style propaganda. If he were posting at “Daily Kos”, a known Liberal blog, I wouldn’t care because those who visit “Kos” fully expect ot hear Liberal propaganda. ;-)

    • Tomfoolery says:

      Thanks, patriotmom!
      We obviously have some talented conservative photoshoppers. I read that the White House actually warned against altering the photo. Hilarious. First they want to restrict our Second Amendment Rights and now our Freedom of Speech contained in the First Amendment.

  2. Arizona Conservative Guy says:

    There’s no doubt this is posturing. Barack Obama is the biggest liberal fraud to sit in the Oval Office. If his lips are moving you can count on the fact that he’s lying. He makes FDR, LBJ, Carter and Slick Willy seem moderate, which is saying a lot!
    Obama wants to show that he is “with” gun owners even as he attempts to restrict their ability to protect themselves and their families by making them former gun owners. Emasculating our populace will serve his purposes as he moves forward with the One World/New World Order scheme begun by George Herbert Walker Bush. We’ve already seen the beginnings with the formation of the European Union and the stated desire by politicians to create a North American Union with the United States, Canada and Mexico. Barack Obama is doing the best to facilitate the plan by opening our borders, and destabilizing the United States. In joining the EU, the European nations gave up their own currencies, the Deutsche mark, Lira, Franc, etc, are all obsolete. The only distinguishing feature separating the European nations is language.

    Even Pope Benedict XVI and the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace are in on the trickery. Last December he called for the “construction of a world community, with a corresponding authority serving the common good of the human family.” In his address, Benedict recalled that John XXIII had called for the “construction of a world community, with a corresponding authority,” to serve the “common good of the human family.” Included is the vision of global financial governance as a response to the world financial crisis.

    That’s pretty damn frightening.

    Then add this additional despicable piece of the puzzle, remembering that George H.W. Bush was the US Ambassador to the United Nations.

    • eubykdisop says:

      Great stuff, Arizona Conservative Guy! Then there’s Henry Kissinger:

      “Kissinger: Obama primed to create ‘New World Order'”

      “Published: 01/06/2009 at 9:07 PM”

      “Conflicts across the globe and an international respect for Barack Obama have created the perfect setting for establishment of “a New World Order,” according to Henry Kissinger, the Nobel Peace Prize winner and former secretary of state under President Nixon.”

      “The president-elect is coming into office at a moment when there is upheaval in many parts of the world simultaneously,” Kissinger responded. “You have India, Pakistan; you have the jihadist movement. So he can’t really say there is one problem, that it’s the most important one. But he can give new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a new world order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.”


  3. Westnash says:

    I actually applaud Barry Obama for shooting skeet and having his picture taken. Most likely it is a smokescreen but at least he does enjoy shooting sports.

    LaPierre made some comments about an inability to get access to mental health records included in background checks. This is an area I think the Dems should give on and could make a huge difference in preventing gun ownership by mentally disturbed people.

    If you go to the AZ border you see huge amounts of money spent and wasted. That seems to be what the Country Club Republicans mean in securing the border. Stop wasting taxpayer money.

    • eubykdisop says:

      I don’t applaud B. Hussein Obama for anything regarding guns. Why? Well, because of what you NEVER want to talk about, Westnash; “Fast and Furious”!

      More people were slaughtered, by FAR, as a result of Obama’s “Fast and Furious” than Tucson, Colorado and Sandy Hook combined! And through the efforts of Holder and Obama, not one single person has yet been held legally accountable for those deaths!

      Who has Obama selected to head up the BATFE? One of the guys who was in charge during “Fast and Furious” and who sought to institute retribution against ATF whistleblowers!

  4. eubykdisop says:

    Hey, Westnash, what do you think about this?

    “Today Americans would be outraged if U.N. troops entered Los Angeles to restore order; tomorrow they will be grateful! This is especially true if they were told there was an outside threat from beyond whether real or promulgated, that threatened our very existence. It is then that all peoples of the world will pledge with world leaders to deliver them from this evil. The one thing every man fears is the unknown. When presented with this scenario, individual rights will be willingly relinquished for the guarantee of their well being granted to them by their world government.” – Henry Kissinger in an address to the Bilderberger meeting at Evian, France.