McCain, Flake, gangsters, take absurd PR border tour

In a newscast nearly as vacuous as Arizona’s amnesty twins John McCain and Jeff McFlake, reporter Navideh Forghani glowingly describes the scene at the Arizona-Mexico border where “this kid” hopped the fence  The Republicrats took a couple of their “Gang of 8” Dem cohorts for a stroll along the border yesterday afternoon. Chuck Schumer (NY) and Michael Bennet (Colo.) got an eyeful as they watched illegals jumping the fence that is woefully inadequate in providing security.

Forghani said, “One of the key tools these senators want to do is provide agents with the right technology to help them patrol the vast border along Mexico. And it’s technology like that tower,” she said pointing off in the distance, “that the senators are talking about, and they tell me that technology will pay for itself because they’ll be charging those hi-tech companies to be a part of border security.”

Doesn’t it seem they should be paying for the services instead of charging the providers?

As if on cue, the reporter pronounced that these wizards are “90 percent complete with the proposed immigration reform.”

New Yorker Schumer who can return to his home 3,000 miles away from the porous border, inanely stated, “Secure the border, and once the border is secured by specific metrics, then people can become citizens.” He said, “What I learned today is we have adequate manpower, but not adequate technology. Technology will work.”

Schumer must have been asleep five years ago when former Homeland Insecurity Chief Michael Chertoff promised the $20 million technology newly put in place was “looking good.” But the “virtual fence” turned out to be a virtual flop. Two months after completion, the feds announced plans to replace the highly touted “virtual fence” with new towers, radars, cameras and computer software, scrapping the brand-new and costly system because it didn’t work.

McCain and Schumer promised this overhaul would pay for itself, while cautioning that their proposed border security package would be costly. “Nobody is going to be totally happy with this legislation, no one will be because we have to make compromises,” John McMaverick said.

Bennet added the Gang of Eight are opposed to double-sided fences along the length of the U.S.-Mexico border.

Makes sense. That might be more difficult to navigate.

In his most sincere tone, Flake opined: “It is difficult sometimes to get a good picture of where we are. We just know we aren’t there yet. We have to do more, but we’ve come a long way.”



6 Responses to McCain, Flake, gangsters, take absurd PR border tour

  1. Delilah says:

    RECALL,,,,,RECALL,,,,,,,RECALL, especially McFlake before he gets entrenched like the McSnake.

  2. Macbeth says:

    Obviously nothing changes with these dedicated amnesty advocates. They are still talking technology, even when it has been shown to be ineffective and expensive.

  3. eubykdisop says:

    Jeff Flake is quoted in the article as having said: “It is difficult sometimes to get a good picture of where we are.”

    No, Jeff, it’s not. You’re lying again. It’s easy to get a good picture of where we are if you listen to the people doing the job of trying to enforce immigration laws instead of taking a “tour” of the border!

    “ICE union complains it’s ‘not welcome’ in immigration talks, wants bigger role”

    “March 27, 2013”

    “Union chief Chris Crane voiced concern in a letter to the senators that “the last four years have been a roller-coaster of ever-changing arrest authorities” that often force officers to violate the law.”

    “Going forward, he wrote, “no reforms to our immigration system will succeed as long as federal officials can continue to unilaterally select which laws are to be enforced — and which are not — based on their own political agendas. Without reform in this area, Congress will certainly be back in the next ten years discussing legislation for yet another proposed amnesty.”

    Gee, Jeff, there it is, all laid out for you! We can hear Chris Crane, how is it that you can’t? Maybe what we really need to spend money on is some hearing aids for Senator Flake!

  4. Scott says:

    These “gangsters” have greater allegiance to illegal invaders than they do the American citizens who foolishly put them in office. The “gangsters” named themselves well.

  5. Observer says:

    This comment from New Yorker Schumer points to the absolute lunacy of the left: “What I learned today is we have adequate manpower, but not adequate technology. Technology will work.” How could anyone in their right mind say something this moronic in view of the failed technology that cost multimillions and was all scrapped?

  6. Army Of One says:

    And where do you think airhead Sarah Palin is on this issue? Here is McCain’s ticket sharing partner back in 2008 as she dropped her pro-amnesty “pathway to citizenship” bomb: