Obama the Redistributionist is on our doorstep

Marxism: “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need”

The Hill’s On The Money, reports that Obama’s budget, to be released this coming Wednesday, will limit how much wealthy individuals – “like Mitt Romney” – can keep in IRAs and other retirement accounts. The proposal would save around $9 billion over a decade, a senior regime official said, while also “bringing more fairness to the tax code.”

Notice the words, “like Mitt Romney,” and “bringing more fairness to the tax code.” These are integral to Obama’s promotion of the politics of class envy.

The administration claims that wealthy taxpayers can currently “accumulate many millions of dollars in these accounts, substantially more than is needed to fund reasonable levels of retirement saving.”

Process that. Rather than encouraging individuals to succeed, the President of the United States, an unabashed Marxist, now deems what is a reasonable amount of money for Americans to hold in their private accounts.

Follow this convoluted thought to its logical conclusion. Successful people don’t rely on the government for handouts, relying upon themselves and their own ingenuity instead. That presents a problem when Nanny government wants to increase its control.  And independent people — most often America’s risk taking job creators — are more likely to vote Republican. That’s why they need to be demonized and have their private wealth confiscated.  Obama has never denied being a redistributionist.

Last month we warned, “On the heels of our recent post Pay attention: Cyprus gov’t raids 60% of private accounts, we have even more alarming news much closer to home. There is a concerted effort playing out within the wildly-spending Obama administration to separate Americans from their hard-earned savings. This post, Obama salivating over $19.4 trillion in U.S. savings tells the rest of the disturbing story.”

This May 2010 article in Human Events titled Republicans Sound Alarm on Administration Plan to Seize 401(k)s, provides important background, including a letter sent to the secretaries of the U.S. Treasury and the Department of Labor signed by over a dozen Republican members of Congress, including House Speaker John Boehner, expressing “our strong opposition to any proposal to eliminate or federalize private-sector defined contribution pension plans, such as 401(k)s, or impose burdensome new requirements upon the businesses, large and small, who choose to offer these plans to their employees.”

If you read “Obama salivating over $19.4 Trillion in U.S. savings” last week, reread it. This information is indispensable as we attempt to survive the long reach of the redistributionist in the White House.

In this video Obama states in explicit terms — “I actually believe in redistribution” — about taking from one group to give to another — blatant thievery — which he calls “fairness,” and making sure “everyone has a shot.”


13 Responses to Obama the Redistributionist is on our doorstep

  1. westnash says:

    Not sure if he is a Marxist but he wants to pull the doers down instead of giving the nondoers a way to climb up, if they should choose.

    • eubykdisop says:

      You’re not sure if he is a Marxist but you wouldn’t want to “blame” Marxism anyway, now would you, Westnash:

      “Westnash says:
      January 11, 2013 at 3:41 am
      Obviously, Euby, it is easy for you to blame Marxism, but impossible to offer a solution for the Arizona Republicans.”

      My bad for “blaming” Marxism, Westnash!

  2. eubykdisop says:

    Bravo, SRAZ! A very clear and complete unmasking of the core of the Obama Marxist economic agenda! Tell it like it is! :-)

  3. Arizona Conservative Guy says:

    This liberal thief who told business owners and entrepreneurs “You didn’t build that” now wants to take what “they didn’t build.” And listen to his liberal crowd roar in approval. This man is president because the education establishment has dumbed down America to the point that they have no frame of reference to the evils of the failed schemes of Communism and Socialism, and now following this Marxist Pied Piper, want to institute them here.

  4. Ellsworth says:

    Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels authors of the 1848 Communist Manifesto were very clear on redistribution.
    The first three principles described are:
    Take control of and redistribute assets.
    A heavy progressive or graduated Income Tax.
    Abolition of all rights of inheritance.

    Wise up people! We have a Marxist in the White House. The goal of his philosophy of “economic justice” is ensuring that the masses will be reliant for their subsistence on the government, and those who earned or inherited their family’s own money are demons to be stripped of their gains.

    • eubykdisop says:

      God bless you, Ellsworth! You know what is in the “Manifesto”, the original source of all of this! Very few have troubled to read it, even though it is the blueprint which Obama is following to the letter!

      I strongly encourage all Conservatives to read one of the English translations of the “Manifesto” on the internet. You will be shocked to find Obama’s entire agenda explicitly laid out there!

  5. eubykdisop says:

    I have written often in this blog about the perils of the “New World Order”, which is the ultimate goal of Obama. Marxism is merely a means to that end.

    Here is Vice President Joe Biden speaking two days ago about the “New World Order”:

    Biden: The ‘affirmative task’ before us is to ‘create a new world order’

    Now if you have no idea what the “New World Order” is, you had better make it a point to find out because THAT is where Obama wants to take us!

    • eubykdisop says:

      “McCain: ‘I Don’t Understand’ Filibustering Gun Control”

      “by Mike Flynn
      7 Apr 2013”

      “Sen. John McCain (R-Sunday Shows) expressed bewilderment on CBS’ “Face the Nation” that GOP Sens. Cruz, Lee and Paul would filibuster gun control legislation. “I don’t understand it,” McCain said. “The purpose of the United States Senate is to debate and to vote and to let the people know where we stand.” With all due respect to Sen. McCain, that is almost completely backward.”

      “The Senate’s first, and only, task is to uphold the Constitution.”

      “I don’t understand why United States senators want to block debate when the leaders said we could have amendments,” McCain noted.”

      “If one believes a legislative proposal is, on its face, unconstitutional, the ability to offer amendments is of little solace.”


  6. LD 12 Committeeman says:

    I’d like to know why our US Senators in the notorious Gang of 8 are busying themselves bringing at least 25 million illegal aliens into the United States to compete for jobs with our own citizens even as Obama is looking for new ways to confiscate what we’ve earned. John McCain and Jeff Flake should be ashamed of themselves for vesting more energy in normalizing criminal invaders than supporting American citizens. Many of these “good” people are not only criminals here, but also in their homelands. And those homelands are not restricted to Mexico, Central and South America, but to China, the Mideast, Russia, Korea and numerous Muslim nations that have sworn allegiance to our annihilation. I don’t think it’s too harsh to refer to any these senators as traitors. I firmly believe that’s what they are. What I don’t understand is why the Republicans (RINOs) think we will be better off for sanctioning this insanity that undermines our own people and heritage. This bears no resemblance to true immigration by people who desire to become Americans, learn our language, adopt our customs and embrace our Constitution. If this collaboration against American citizens becomes law, I will have no difficulty reregistering and leaving the Republican Party. As Ronald Reagan said about the Democrats, “I didn’t leave the Democrat party, it left me.”

    • eubykdisop says:

      Well, LD 12 Committeeman, all I can tell you is that the answer has already been given in my post just above yours.

      No offense to you, but it does get a little old hearing people ask “why” and acting shocked and outraged. Isn’t it time that we moved on to the next step?

      Those who are actively working to bring about the “New World Order” are NOT divided along party lines. They are in both political parties. What unites their efforts is their priority commitment to implementing the “New World Order” ABOVE all else, including adherence to Republican principles and the Republican platform.

      Now, unless and until Conservatives and Republicans understand that, we are going to waste our time jousting at windmills. How is that? It is because we are failing to identify and address the real, core, underlying issue; propagation of the “New World Order”.

      The litmus test for Republican candidates should be their knowledge of and opposition to all aspects of the “New World Order”. If they are ignorant of it or if they feign ignorance of it, then they are useless to us. If they support it or are equivocal about where they stand, they are useless to us. Yet not once have I heard a potential Republican candidate queried about the “New World Order”!

      Here we have the Vice President of The United States saying that the affirmative task before us is to create a “New World Order” and you don’t see any journalists in the mainstream media asking Biden about that. What does that tell you?

      AS a PC, why don’t you try an experiment? The next time you have the opportunity to ask questions of a potential candidate, why don’t you ask about the “New World Order” and see what kind of a response you get? First, of course, you’ll have to yourself become informed about the “New World Order” so that you can ask cogent questions.

  7. LD 12 Committeeman says:

    PS: I neglected to mention that I am a longtime elected Precinct Committeeman. So is my wife, and daughter and son-in-law. We are united in this view.

  8. eubykdisop says:

    “Bill Ayers confirms what Obama has denied”

    “Weatherman domestic terrorist finally spills the beans”

    “by Aaron Klein”

    “Weatherman domestic terrorist Bill Ayers is now confirming what the White House has previously denied – that he held a fundraiser in his living room for Barack Obama.”


  9. eubykdisop says:

    “Barack Obama Net Worth”

    “The 44th president of the United States, … Barack Hussein Obama II, has a net worth between $2,801,012 and $11,830,000, according to analysis of his 2012 financial disclosure forms.”

    “President Barack Obama’s base salary is $400,000 a year. He also has access to a $150,000 expense account as well as a $100,000 tax free travel account and $20,000 entertainment budget.”

    “Obama will receive a pension of nearly $200,000 per year (based on current levels) when he leaves the White House. He will also receive money for expenses including rental payments, staff salaries and travel expenses.”

    Gee, Barry, that’s too much! A PENSION of $200,000 per year? How many Americans are going to get a “pension” like that?

    Sorry, Barry, we’re seizing your money and we are going to “redistribute” it!