Hillary’s amnesty deceit gravely imperils USA

Brazen lies a way of life for Hillary Clinton

Hot Air reports on this 2003 sound bite from Hillary Clinton, saying:

  “We’ve got to do several things and I am, you know, adamantly against illegal immigrants. I made this exception basically on humanitarian grounds because of the individual story but certainly we’ve got to do more at our borders. And people have to stop employing illegal immigrants. Come up to Westchester, go to Suffolk and Nassau counties, stand in the street corners in Brooklyn or the Bronx – you’re going to see loads of people waiting to get picked up to go do yard work.”   — Hillary Clinton, John Gambling Radio Show, February 2003

 Fast forward to May 6, 2015 in Las Vegas where, as a Democrat candidate for U.S. President, Hillary declares her intent to “go even further” than Barack Obama in gifting full citizenship to those in our country illegally.  Watch video here.

Like her husband, Hillary Clinton is an accomplished liar. Whether the issues go back decades to the suspiciously missing Rose Law Firm documents regarding the Whitewater scandal, her Benghazi deception as Secretary of State, blaming the “vast right-wing conspiracy” for her husband‘s renown philandering, falsely claiming to dodge sniper bullets in Bosnia or trying to prove her amnesty creds by declaring her own American-born grandmother was an immigrant, Hillary Clinton lacks even a passing acquaintance with the truth. The Clinton Foundation scandal, worthy of a federal investigation, grows with every passing day, as more foreign governments seeking favors are revealed as mega donors.

There is no topic more crucial to the survival of the United States as we know it than the issue of curtailing the continuing flood of illegal immigration. ISIS is now a homegrown threat, recruiting  within our border, according to ABC News, yet millions of unvetted Muslims have been granted legal access to our country and are being settled in far-reaching communities from Idaho to Tennessee.

In 2011, we wrote Hezbollah on our doorstep: Radical Muslims in border towns, which included a chilling ABC 10 News report from San Diego, detailing evidence that the Shi’a Muslim terrorist group Hezbollah has a long-established foothold across the border in Tijuana.

As far back as October 2001, WND carried an article titled Arab terrorists crossing border, warning of a “tremendous increase in OTM’s (law enforcement’s term for ‘Other Than Mexicans’). Illegals from the former Soviet Union, Asia, and the Middle East are joining the flood of Mexicans, Central and South Americans — all slipping in through our incredibly accessible and porous Southern border. Apprehensions have included illegals from the Sudan, Iraq, and even Iran.”

Hillary Clinton, who wants to return to the White House at any cost, is unconcerned. The rest of us better be.

10 Responses to Hillary’s amnesty deceit gravely imperils USA

  1. SmallGovt. says:

    Her video was very clear. Promise to make them citizens. See the new book “Clinton Cash” also to see all the graft the family has taken.

    Republicans need to determine a candidate very soon who give a clear choice.

  2. Pima Pal says:

    It’s unlikely that any conservatives who assemble here would be inclined to vote for Hillary Clinton. But it’s also a good bet that many of us know or are even related to people who would do so. I urge you to send them the link to this post. The reasons for keeping her out of the White House exceed her known (and as yet unknown) lies. They also supercede the usual partisan divide. The critical issue is her willing surrender to open borders which will ultimately destroy America by allowing our sworn enemies free access to our citizens, and the cities and towns in which they live. Have we learned nothing from September 11, 2001? America hating Jihadists killed 3,000 innocent people that day. Yes, they were here on Visas. But they were student Visas and none were students, and the documents had expired.

    • azgary says:

      all of the presumed big name republican presidential candidates are for amnesty(while denying it), and most are also for massive increases of legal immigration, in other words they are very little different from Hillary, McCain, Obama etc… in that regards

      so they are no more palatable than her.

      no support for any amnesty supporter regardless of party or office.

      and to be clear, anything including the status quo that does not remove illegals from the country IS amnesty.

  3. azgary says:

    everybody’s amnesty gravely imperils the USA, and unfortunately this peril is also represented by most republican politicians, including az’s senators the az5 republican U.S. reps and ALL of the big name presumed republican presidential candidates.

    being a republican and for amnesty makes no politician more acceptable than a democrat and they do not deserve a vote. they are choosing foreign invaders, the chambers of commerce and the creation of a permanent democrat voting majority over American citizens.

    no amnesty supporter, by whatever name or scheme they call their version of amnesty, all while vehemently denying they are for amnesty, deserves a vote period.

    republican or democrat, they are destroyers and on the republican side the result of lesser of two evils voting where no matter how much they screw you, me and the nation they know they will still be voted for under the great republican mantra of lesser of two evils.

    there is NO lesser evil when it comes to amnesty.

    if a politician will not say illegals must leave by choice or by force and immediately, they are for amnesty and are making the choice against American citizens.

    • Villanova says:

      While I agree with you and SRAZ about the monumental perils associated with the pathetically under addressed and continued illegal invasion, there is one enormous difference between a Republican in the White House and a Democrat. The President appoints U.S. Supreme Court Justices.

      In the intervening year and a half before the 2016 election, Obama could be positioned to make another one, or God help us, two appointments that would tip the court even further and irreversibly left.

      Anthony Kennedy now revels in holding the squishy Sandra O’Connor swing vote. We were already screwed by G.W. Bush appointee CJ John Roberts on Obamacare. It‘s crucial we elect a Republican for this reason alone. The three women are all far left liberals. Two, Sonia Sotomayor (61) and Elena Kagan (55) are comparably young, but Ginsburg is 82 and in ill health.

      The solid conservatives, Clarence Thomas (67), Antonin Scalia (79), and Samuel Alito (65) sit with liberal Stephen Breyer (77).

      The court is too important to leave in the hands of liberals. I won’t be able to look by children or grandchildren in the eye if I throw my vote down the toilet. No candidate is perfect, but some are more perfect than others.

      http://ballotpedia.org/Supreme_Court_of_the_United_States

      • azgary says:

        your lesser of two evils argument is old hat and why we are in the shythole we are in, and you saying you will vote republican no matter how much they will harm us, your children and your grand children just enables them to skrew us harder sans lube

        none of it will matter after amnesty creates a permanent democrat voting majority(and it will), and republicans in the white house matters little when they are generally afraid to appoint conservative judges, just as majorities in the senate do not matter when they will not block confirmations.

        amnesty creates a permanent democrat voting majority is all you need to know ant THE issue that all others hinge upon, we lose that battle ALL of the others are lost in the future, good bye constitution, good bye USA.

        that is the future your children and grandchildren have to look forward to with amnesty

      • ZOO says:

        It seems premature to worry about future SCOTUS appointments while the future of the U.S. hangs by a thread in the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

        If DACA and DAPA are upheld, you can start blowing Taps. If they are struck down and the Republican elite and spittle-leaking electorate hand Bush the nomination, the GOP will surrender 2016. It could easily wind up a game of “heads I win – tales you lose.”

  4. Conservative Since Birth says:

    The crazy-eyed, power-mad harridan pandering to Hispanics, promising them the world for their vote. She’ll be a holy terror in the White House. At least she’s telling us what she’ll do on immigration. The Republicans will dance and even lie.

    Here is a 4 min.video on Muslim Refugee Resettlement and how they get here:

  5. Doc says:

    The scary thing is that as many outright LIES as this creature has been caught red-handed in, & the level of arrogance she proudly displays, she still has a huge amount of support! Her fan base even includes our own ?senator? john mcTraitor…who calls her a “rock star”.The previous comment also applies to him as well….
    …we’re skrewed….

  6. jon jensen says:

    Sending a link to hillary’s past is waste of time, all the hispanics care about is she is for granting citizenship to illegals now! That is why republican candidates for president are crying saying that is unfair to them. In 2012 hispanics were 10.5% of total vote in 2016 it will be at least 12% and could be 13% if they go out and vote for hillary Why do you think juan bush and juan mccain have abandoned republican party position on immigration?