Why Justice Scalia mattered

On Tuesday we witnessed the full impact of the unexpected loss of Justice Antonin Scalia who died February 13. The U.S. Supreme Court rendered a 4-4 decision on a challenge to organized labor, giving unions a major victory in a case they had previously seemed certain to lose.

The deadlocked decision in Friedrichs v. California Teachers Association upheld a lower court ruling dealing with union fees and is a substantial setback for union foes. Lyle Denniston writing for SCOTUS blog provides an opinion analysis.

A decision in favor of the petitioners would have eliminated what’s known as agency fees –– money paid to unions by non-union members.

Plaintiffs in the case argued that agency fees presented a “significant impingement” on their First Amendment rights of free speech and free association, since collective bargaining is unarguably political. In negotiating with school boards, for example, unions can take positions on issues such as tenure that nonmembers may not support, so teachers who decide not to join the local union should not have to contribute to those costs.

The California Teachers Association and its parent union, the NEA, argued that the fees are not a violation of First Amendment rights because a portion is reimbursed annually, claiming the money covers things that benefit non-union members.

In 1977, the Supreme Court’s decision in Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, held that no one can be forced to join a union or contribute to its political activities, but that teachers unions can charge nonmembers a fee to cover the costs of nonpolitical activities, oddly including collective bargaining.

In recent years, public sector unions have experienced numerous setbacks, with Republican governors and state legislatures successfully challenging collective bargaining — even in Michigan and Wisconsin, regarded as longtime labor strongholds.

The Friedrichs case was not the first to challenge union fees. Last year, in Harris v. Quinn, the justices ruled 5-4, that Medicaid home health workers were not full public employees and therefore could not be compelled to pay collective bargaining union fees –– a  decision that many Supreme Court watchers viewed as a sign the court seemed poised to overturn the precedent set by Abood.

Open Secrets (Center for Responsive Politics) reveals the $19.2 million the American Federation of Teachers and the National Education Association, teachers unions contributed in the 2012 elections and their continuing donations in 2016. Democrats and liberal groups are their favored beneficiaries. Since 1989, the NEA has been the fourth biggest donor out of all organizations tracked by CRP.

6 Responses to Why Justice Scalia mattered

  1. PV PC says:

    The void created by Justice Scalia’s death has the potential to negatively impact Americans for generations to come. Obama is chomping at the bit to reconfigure the Supreme Court in his own far left image. Unfortunately, the Republicrat class including squish AZ Sen. Jeff Flake, Obama’s traveling companion and basketball buddy, appear willing to help him.


  2. jakesez says:

    This situation is worse than any political election. Not only does it prevent the court from blocking unconstitutional legislation, it can encourages the left to write more unconstitutional laws since they will feel that they have a protector in the court rather than a judge. Say good bye to any sense of equal justice under the law. What was equal justice is now going to be chosen justice. I choose to enforce this law on you but choose not to enforce the same law on my donors and political allies. Hillary come to mind?

  3. Conservative Since Birth says:

    Here is the California teacher requesting the court to rehear the case. Unless we manage to get a Republican president who will put a conservative on the court, our future is doomed for generations.

    Teacher to Petition Court to Rehear Case on Compulsory Union Dues

    • Seeing Red AZ says:

      Conservative Since Birth,
      We appreciate the Free Beacon article, which adds dimension to the SRAZ post. Our readers are the best!

  4. Joseph Bickley, Sr. says:

    I am continually amazed at the depth of coverage and research Seeing Red AZ does in bringing these daily insights to us. A journal we might subscribe to with this much clarity and conservative honesty would cost megabuck$. Your readers are “awesomated” by the professional journalism you consistently give us.

    • Seeing Red AZ says:

      Joseph Bickley, Sr,
      Your kind words serve as motivation to keep providing conservative views for our (mostly) conservative base of readers. We sincerely appreciate the ever increasing number of readers who find value in what Seeing Red AZ has contributed to the political discussion since our initial post appeared June 23, 2007.