Black murderers morph into white supremacists

December 13, 2019

Facts are incidental, take back seat to anti-Trump agenda

According to leftist Joy Behar, one of the coarse fanatics on “The View,” these are the faces (pictured below) of white supremacists. David Anderson and Francine Graham have been identified as the assassins at the New Jersey kosher grocery store shooting that left 6 people dead, including a responding police officer, who was the father of five. The two murderers were among the dead.

Lacking any facts, but riding her agenda at full speed, radical Behar immediately jumped to the wrong conclusion, in her ongoing desire to smear President Donald Trump, who she considers as the overarching specter behind all evil.

The carnage is being investigated as an act of domestic terrorism.

In a now deleted tweet captured by Andy Ngo,  U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, self-identified as a “Palestinian American and proud  Muslima,” was also eager to blame “white supremacy,” which she noted, “kills.”


Mark Levin, Alan Dershowitz agree impeachment is a sham

December 9, 2019

Political opposites find agreement on impeachment

If you missed Sunday’s Mark Levin program, “Life, Liberty & Levin” we are happy to bring you the important interview with Harvard law professor emeritus Alan Dershowitz, a self described liberal. Although he admits voting for Hillary Clinton, Dershowitz describes impeaching President Trump under the current circumstances as an example of political tyranny, questioning the ethics of the U.S. House.

The article,Liberal attorney Alan Dershowitz: Dems’ impeachment case doesn’t meet any credible legal standard,“ is well worth your time…especially today.

This, and more, are all available on The Blaze.


Did you know? Trump’s immigration policy is just bigotry

December 3, 2019

Leftist reporter pushes bigotry farce

That tripe is what you’d be fed if you read the hemorrhaging subscriptions Arizona Republic. A recent column in the one-sided Viewpoints section titled, “There’s no other way to explain Trump’s immigration policy. It’s just bigotry,” shamelessly attempts to make the fallacious case. This is the opening salvo:

“It was never about protecting the border, rule of law or the U.S. economy. And it was never about “illegal” immigration, for that matter.

Trump’s anti-immigrant bigotry was always just anti-immigrant bigotry.

There’s no other way to explain the Trump administration’s latest onslaught against foreigners of all kinds, regardless of their potential economic contributions, our own international commitments or any given immigrant’s propensity to follow the law. Trump’s rhetoric may focus on “illegals,” but recent data releases suggest this administration has been blocking off every available avenue for legal immigration, too.”

Truth is not a concern for either the Hillary-endorsing, Trump-hating newspaper or the agenda-driven columnist who conveniently omits the fact that Trump‘s own mother was an immigrant. The writer is merely identified by name and her twitter account, where the dwindling readership is invited to follow her. There is no mention of the fact that Catherine Rampell is an editorialist for the radically left Washington Post. She was previously employed by the ideological counterpart New York Times. Neither newspaper endorses Republicans for president, although the Times made an exception 64 years ago when it endorsed Dwight Eisenhower.

American workers do not need competition from imported workers. Our economy is strong based on the fact that record setting employment has been attained under the Trump administration. The unemployment rate holding steady at 3.5% is the lowest it has been since 1969 — over 50 years ago. All Americans are benefiting from the labor market’s continued improvement. We are witnessing historically low unemployment rates for Black and Hispanic Americans, celebrated by President Trump, yet he is routinely described by his left-wing detractors as a “racist.”

Rampell’s assertion regarding “Immigrants propensity to follow the law,” cannot go unchallenged. Since the leftist media uses the words “migrant, undocumented and immigrant” interchangeably to describe illegal aliens — unwilling to make the distinction for actual lawful immigrants — it’s important to note that while legal immigrants may have a lower crime rate, crimes committed by illegals is, and has been, disproportionately higher. The border state of Arizona stands as an example. Following their initial crime entering the U.S. in violation of the law, compounded by using counterfeit or trafficked/stolen ID to gain employment, rent an apartment, access benefits or enroll their kids in school, other crimes, including felonies, become standard operating procedure. America is a country to be used, not revered.

Leftist myopia is the problem. It is not President Donald Trump.


Border wall gets a push from Kush

November 26, 2019

Jared Kushner, President Trump’s influential senior adviser and son-in-law, is reportedly now in charge of expediting construction of America’s much needed border wall. The president has been met with resistance in implementing his popular campaign promise, as Democrat House leadership has repeatedly withheld funds necessary for completion of what they derisively refer to as “Trump‘s wall.”

The Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) which has dedicated forty years to exposing the loopholes in our immigration system, supports President Trump’s efforts to restore the rule of law and make legal immigration work for America.

The Trump Administration Immigration Accomplishments are detailed in this timeline. FAIR’s website contains a wealth of information that we recommend bookmarking for updated facts that you won’t get from MSM sources committed to leaving us vulnerable via an open border.

Crime and corruption, which permeate Mexico and Central America continually make their way across our southern border — with the support of Dem lawmakers who view the criminal invaders as a reliable, burgeoning voting bloc. 

Even admittedly left-wing NPR was forced to acknowledge that the number of journalists killed in Mexico reached ‘Historical High.’

For the security of our nation, it is imperative we expose the truth and reelect President Trump, whom the left has been committed to impeaching since he took his oath of office January 20, 2017.


Phx thieves have advocates who denounce police

November 18, 2019

Local newspaper supports lawlessness

The City of Phoenix has a transportation farce known as light rail. It was the costly brainchild of then-Phoenix Mayor Phil Gordon, whose family and friends benefited from its construction, as businesses along its path suffered or permanently closed while it cut through the city. Construction began in March 2005. It began operation Dec. 27, 2008.

Just like riding a bus, going to the movie, or getting a haircut, there are fees to access the service. According to its website, there are various ways and places to purchase tickets, including fare vending machines at the light rail stations. Reduced fares are available to youths ages 6-18, seniors 65 and over, and the disabled. Violators are supposedly subject to fines ranging from $50 to $500, plus any court fees, and may lose their transit privileges — which is nothing more than an idle threat.

Therein lies the rub, as Shakespeare’s Hamlet might have said. No one routinely collects the tickets, which has made the trains a haven for the non-paying homeless. Because the rail cars are air conditioned, they provide these folks a respite from the summer heat and winter chill, plus a soft seat and scenic ride.

Since they are driving paying passengers away, police have begun occasional “fare sweeps” to “encourage fare and code of conduct compliance,” as described by the failing newspaper’s ASU Cronkite journalism school student intern Alyssa Stoney. Her sympathy clearly lies with the non-paying riders, whose advocates are given prominence in the newspaper’s report.

Yes. Street bums have advocates.

Light rail is estimated to cost over $140 million dollars per mile to build. That does not include the expense of maintenance and operation. It is obviously not a free ride, even for those taxpayers who were forced to fund it to the tune of $1.4 billion at its 2008 opening, though have never ridden it. Expansion continues.

But a group calling itself ‘Living United for Change in Arizona’ protested the “police sweeps.” Going by the acronym LUCHA, it is warmly described by co-executive director Alejandra Gomez as a “membership-led economic justice organization that is trying to support the most vulnerable communities that struggle on a day-to-day basis to make ends meet.”

New flash for Alejandra: So do many honest, hardworking Phoenix citizens who pay for what they use. Not doing so is theft, which is a crime.


Finally…SCOTUS hears oral arguments on DACA

November 13, 2019

In a victory for the Trump administration, oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court began Tuesday morning on the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (which morphed into the acronym DACA). President Trump moved to end the program in 2017 but was thwarted by lower court rulings.

Estimates of those affected by Obama’s political construct via an executive order, bypassing congress, now range between 700,000 to 800,000. The flawed premise was to bestow the gift of U.S. citizenship to those who needed only affirm they were 16 years of age or younger when they initially entered the United States or arrived by 2007. They merely had to declare that they have been of good moral character since initially being brought to the U.S. as children by their invader parents — illegally. Verifying how many came as babes in arms or ably propelled themselves over the border last month is impossible to substantiate. Many of those who claim to have been brought as babes in arms are now grandparents.

Government attorneys representing the Trump administration told the court that the program “sanctions the ongoing violation of federal law by more than half a million people,” arguing it is not authorized by immigration statutes. They stated leaving DACA in place interferes with the ability to send “a message that leaves no doubt regarding the clear, consistent and transparent enforcement of the immigration laws.”

A ruling isn’t expected until mid 2020.

DACA worked hand-in-hand with another scam known as the D.R.E.A.M. Act. The acronym stood for Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors. It was introduced as S.1291. The 2002 bill was drafted before the speech police ruled the words “illegal” and “alien” unacceptable, so they were used extensively throughout the bill.

The D.R.E.A.M. Act, an actual nightmare, whose recipients slickly morphed into “Dreamers,” was a liberal dream come true, a warm and fuzzy piece of legislation also lacking any means of verification while permanently swelling the ranks of the Democrat Party. Read SRAZ’s complete 2016 post,D.R.E.A.M. Act morphs into dreamy amnesty.” Knowledge is power.

Those who claim this status have obtained protection from deportation under DACA, which permits them to work legally in the United States and also provides access to myriad benefits including driver’s licenses, in-state tuition rates at state colleges and universities, education grants, the ability to apply for Social Security Numbers — required to claim Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC), a major tax benefit for lower-income earners — which allows recipients to participate in Social Security and Medicare. 

The open border, pro-illegals Arizona Republic runs a bizarre and insulting op-ed by Arizona’s worst governor, Janet Napolitano. A radical leftist noted for her blasé retort when frustrated Arizonans pleaded for border action: “Show me a 50-foot fence, and I’ll show you a 51-foot ladder,” she was at the Supreme Court yesterday opposing the Trump administration. We are not linking to her convoluted rationale. She resigned the governor’s post to become Obama’s Secretary of Homeland INsecurity. Her latest argument is, “Ending DACA is profoundly negative.”


Sanity prevails: Tucson rejects ‘sanctuary city’ status

November 6, 2019

Voters overwhelmingly declare, “No sanc you!”

Tucson voters soundly rejected Prop 205 Tuesday, tossing out the prospect of characterizing the city as foolish by becoming Arizona’s first sanctuary city. The final vote was 71.40 against the ballot measure. A scant 28.60 voted in favor of sanity run amok.

A far left group with the benign sounding name, “Tucson Families Free and Together,” led the ballot initiative. The flawed measure was widely opposed by local leaders of both political parties, including the Pima County Sheriff, Tucson Police officials and Tucson’s majority Democrat city council and mayor.

Among the left-wing organizations supporting Prop. 205 were ACLU of Arizona; Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), Tucson; Planned Parenthood; Standing Up for Racial Justice and No More Deaths.

The intent of the rejected ballot proposition was for the city of Tucson to formally limit cooperation with federal immigration authorities — in violation of state law. In 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court upheld provisions of Arizona‘s ‘Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act,’ known as SB 1070, (signed into law by Gov. Jan Brewer in 2010) that required cooperation.