Prof’s apt reply to ‘Person of the Year’ Greta Thunberg

Time Magazine recently named Greta Thunberg ‘Person of the Year.” The strident Swedish 16-year-old, who is traveling far too much to rightly be described as a school girl, (she is, in fact, a drop-out) is heralded for denouncing world leaders who don’t ascribe to her climate change activism, specifically omitting naming major polluters China and India while blasting the U.S. The financing of her global travels remains a mystery. Her insults shrilly barked from the platform oddly given her at the United Nations, were specifically hurled at the United States and our President Donald Trump. For this she has become the darling of the leftist media.

Thunberg encouraged worldwide student school strikes for climate and blasted United Nations representatives with her “How Dare You” speech — threatening, “We will not let you get away with this…we will never forgive you.” For this, she has become praiseworthy as the youngest Time honoree.

The issue of climate change, regarded as cyclical by many scientific experts, has been hijacked by anarchists and this arrogant teen afflicted with Asperger Syndrome who is the daughter of an opera singer and an actor. She commands international attention as she issues threats and accuses the U.S. and industrialized nations of “stealing my dreams.” Hatred of America, the most generous nation on the planet, is a guaranteed attention grabber.

Professor Jason D. Hill responds to Greta Thunberg with a brilliant commentary, titled, “An Open Letter to Greta Thunberg: You are not a moral leader. But I will tell you what you are.”  Hill’s extensive credentials follow his open letter.

It was published on Front Page mag and is definitely worth your time.

Shining a dose of antiseptic sunlight on the magazine’s radical left perspective, Time itself notes its other finalists “were three people at the center of the impeachment proceedings against President Trump: the president himself, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) and the anonymous whistleblower whose complaint helped set the impeachment inquiry in motion.”

What a surprise.

Dems prioritize impeachment,except when golf’s on

Distraught Democrats, who began discussing the prospect of impeaching President Donald Trump immediately after his inauguration, have made good on their promise, while kicking the Constitution in the shins. Unable to get over their angst that scandal-plagued Hillary Clinton lost the 2016 election, they’ve come up with novel, politically motivated charges in the articles of impeachment they’ve brought against the Republican president: one for abuse of power and a second for obstruction of Congress. The surging economy and record employment numbers are not on their retribution focused minds.

The Dems are moving at breakneck speed, hoping to beat the 2020 election clock while overturning the 2016 vote they despised. The other compelling force is the impending loss of ailing, 86-year-old Supreme Court Associate Justice, former ACLU lawyer Ruth Bader Ginsburg. It would be unthinkable to them if President Trump made a third appointment to the high court, definitively altering the composite for decades to come. These impeachment obsessed leftists take their jobs seriously. Nothing can diminish their dedication…except a good golf game, as Louisiana Democrat U.S. Rep. Cedric Levon Richmond demonstrates. He’s definitely got his priorities in order, and a guy who forges his own path. When he and his bride married, they registered for gifts at Williams Sonoma and Babies R Us.

"Accuses?"

Really?

It's on VIDEO!pic.twitter.com/Qu0Npl8RrD https://t.co/JgyUzJH91g

— Steve Guest (@SteveGuest) December 13, 2019

*H/T Video courtesy of Steve Guest, RNC’s Rapid Response Director

Anti-Trump play to debut in Phoenix

In a move sure to arouse more than toe-tapping, the Phoenix Theatre Company (PTC) is veering from solid entertainment to celebrating illegal immigration. Season ticket holders are paying to be propagandized by political leftism masquerading as a musical.

‘Americano!’ is being heralded as the centerpiece of The Phoenix Theatre Company’s 100th Anniversary Season for 2020. It doesn’t come cheap to be insulted and have your belief in the rule of law demeaned. Decent Saturday night seats run close to $100 bucks apiece, not including additional “fees.”

This synopsis comes directly from the PTC: “This musical true story follows Tony, the child of immigrants who discovers his undocumented status when he tries to enlist in the Marines. With his lifelong dream of serving in the military vanishing quickly, Tony must confront his family, his heritage, and a deeply divided country. Featuring a sumptuous original score of new music, Americano! casts a profoundly human light on what it means to be a Dreamer.”

Notice the word manipulation:

“Child of immigrants”: Omits the word “illegal.” Actual immigrants come to the United States legally.

“Undocumented status”: They have plenty of documents. Our 2008 post titled, “Lingo,” provides the facts.  Read Number 3.

“Dreamer”: Read D.R.E.A.M. Act morphs into dreamy amnesty.

If this is the latest trend in live theater, rational Valley residents might want to reconsider their entertainment options.

Dems take their own pulse, as Americans rally in Pres’ support

It’s been said that a doctor who treats himself has a fool for a patient. The same can be said in reference to Democrats suffering from Trump Derangement Syndrome who self medicate by overdosing on potentially lethal impeachment meds. Political irony at its best was on full display Tuesday. Partisan extremists who populate the Democrat Party moved forward with farcical articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, the same day, Americans turned out by the thousands to attend his Hershey, Pennsylvania rally.

Trump enthusiast Scott Presler gifts us with his video showing the massive crowd supporting the president. Hundreds waited more than 10 hours enduring, rain, and freezing temps to ensure a seat.

Illuminating their own inconsistencies, the Trump-hating Dems also announced they were going to pass the signature trade deal of a president they say is “too dangerous to leave in office.”  The U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA ) replaces the problematic North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

And on the brink of the Dem’s sure-to-backfire impeachment of the president, a new dynamic is evident. The President is seeing a significant boost in support. Recent polling results by Firehouse Strategies/Optimus are headlined: “BREAKING: As Impeachment Moves Ahead Trump Surges in Battleground States.”

And that impeachment? First declared as a goal immediately following his inauguration, by Maxine Waters, the earliest motivations were tied to China and Russia collusion. When those contrived constructs didn’t pan out, the Dems fast forwarded to baseless charges of bribery and extortion, also duds. Finally they settled on impeachment is “in the public interest.” The best economic news we’ve had in decades is irrelevant to the left. Instead they run on the socialist promises of “free” health care and college they know they can’t deliver and advancing open borders, undermining our nation’s rule of law and sovereignty.

It’s actually all about two women. The first is scandal-plagued Hillary Clinton who Trump trounced in 2016. The second is Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, 86, and ailing. If she dies on Trump’s watch, he will get a third Supreme Court nominee, unthinkable in the mind of leftists. Refresh your memory here.

Did you know? Trump’s immigration policy is just bigotry

Leftist reporter pushes bigotry farce

That tripe is what you’d be fed if you read the hemorrhaging subscriptions Arizona Republic. A recent column in the one-sided Viewpoints section titled, “There’s no other way to explain Trump’s immigration policy. It’s just bigotry,” shamelessly attempts to make the fallacious case. This is the opening salvo:

“It was never about protecting the border, rule of law or the U.S. economy. And it was never about “illegal” immigration, for that matter.

Trump’s anti-immigrant bigotry was always just anti-immigrant bigotry.

There’s no other way to explain the Trump administration’s latest onslaught against foreigners of all kinds, regardless of their potential economic contributions, our own international commitments or any given immigrant’s propensity to follow the law. Trump’s rhetoric may focus on “illegals,” but recent data releases suggest this administration has been blocking off every available avenue for legal immigration, too.”

Truth is not a concern for either the Hillary-endorsing, Trump-hating newspaper or the agenda-driven columnist who conveniently omits the fact that Trump‘s own mother was an immigrant. The writer is merely identified by name and her twitter account, where the dwindling readership is invited to follow her. There is no mention of the fact that Catherine Rampell is an editorialist for the radically left Washington Post. She was previously employed by the ideological counterpart New York Times. Neither newspaper endorses Republicans for president, although the Times made an exception 64 years ago when it endorsed Dwight Eisenhower.

American workers do not need competition from imported workers. Our economy is strong based on the fact that record setting employment has been attained under the Trump administration. The unemployment rate holding steady at 3.5% is the lowest it has been since 1969 — over 50 years ago. All Americans are benefiting from the labor market’s continued improvement. We are witnessing historically low unemployment rates for Black and Hispanic Americans, celebrated by President Trump, yet he is routinely described by his left-wing detractors as a “racist.”

Rampell’s assertion regarding “Immigrants propensity to follow the law,” cannot go unchallenged. Since the leftist media uses the words “migrant, undocumented and immigrant” interchangeably to describe illegal aliens — unwilling to make the distinction for actual lawful immigrants — it’s important to note that while legal immigrants may have a lower crime rate, crimes committed by illegals is, and has been, disproportionately higher. The border state of Arizona stands as an example. Following their initial crime entering the U.S. in violation of the law, compounded by using counterfeit or trafficked/stolen ID to gain employment, rent an apartment, access benefits or enroll their kids in school, other crimes, including felonies, become standard operating procedure. America is a country to be used, not revered.

Leftist myopia is the problem. It is not President Donald Trump.

George Soros’ dedication to stealing elections

Dems 2020 Election Strategy: If you can’t beat ’em, cheat ‘em

We recently happened upon The Pickering Post, an Australian site whose well-researched article on voter fraud is definitely worth reading — especially since it mentions Arizona among the states where thousands of “mis-votes” were deemed to be “calibration errors.”

During the 2016 election cycle a Soros-funded group ran televised ads attacking then incumbent Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery, who is now an Arizona Supreme Court Justice. At the time unknown Democrat Diego Rodriguez entrance into the race was considered a yawner until Soros pumped $1.3 million into the race against Montgomery, who nonetheless won reelection. Soros also funded Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone to the tune of nearly $3 million, defeating popular 6-term Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Penzone’s second effort.

Soros spent millions in 2015 and 2016 funding campaigns to defeat local prosecutors around the country and elect new ones who back his far left criminal justice reform measures. Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx, who purposely dropped the ball on Jussie Smollett’s criminal contrivance, was funded by Soros who donated $408,000 in her campaign PAC.

Author Howell Woltz details the deliberate deception. As an example, he writes:

“Imagine Illinois Republican Jim Moynihan’s surprise. In the recent election, he pressed the button beside his own name at the Schaumburg Public Library and the “Smartmatic” voting machine registered his vote for his Democrat Socialist opponent.”

The ABC mentioned in the post is Australian Broadcasting Corporation not to be confused with American Broadcasting Company. Australia’s national broadcaster was founded 90 years ago, and principally funded by direct grants from the Australian government.

The man behind the voluminous curtain of fraud is none other than George Soros. Check out the Discover the Networks page dedicated to exposing Soros’ tentacles reaching into a vast web of organizations.

POLITICO previously exposed George Soros’ behind the scenes efforts to effect a “quiet overhaul the U.S. Justice System.” This is serious business and we need to be fully aware of Soros‘ long range plans to dismantle the United States as we know it. He has long expressed his disdain for national sovereign borders.

Soros’ most recently estimated net worth is $8.3 Billion. Don’t be tempted to take comfort in the fact that Soros is 89 years old.  He has five children, at least two of whom, Jonathan Tivadar Soros, 49, and his half-brother Alexander Soros, 34, are dedicated to continuing their father’s quest for worldwide domination.

Dem Michael Bloomberg BEFORE he was a Presidential candidate

Far Left billionaire Michael Bloomberg says raising taxes on poor people is a “good thing.” (Speaking at event with International Monetary Fund’s Christine Lagarde: April 19, 2018)

Michael Bloomberg: “Some people say, well, taxes are regressive. But in this case, yes they are. That’s the good thing about them because the problem is in people that don’t have a lot of money. And so, higher taxes should have a bigger impact on their behavior and how they deal with themselves. So, I listen to people saying ‘oh we don’t want to tax the poor.’ Well, we want the poor to live longer so that they can get an education and enjoy life. And that’s why you do want to do exactly what a lot of people say you don’t want to do.

The question is do you want to pander to those people? Or do you want to get them to live longer? There’s just no question. If you raise taxes on full sugary drinks, for example, they will drink less and there’s just no question that full sugar drinks are one of the major contributors to obesity and obesity is one of the major contributors to heart disease and cancer and a variety of other things.

So, it’s like saying, ‘I don’t want to stop using coal because coal miners will go out of work, will lose their jobs.’ We have a lot of soldiers in the United States in the US Army, but we don’t want to go start a war just to give them something to do and that’s exactly what you’re saying when you say ‘well, let’s keep coal killing people because we don’t want coal miners to lose their jobs.’ The truth of the matter is that there aren’t very many coal miners left anyways and we can find other things for them to do. But the comparison is: a life or a job. Or, taxes or life? Which do you want to do? Take your poison.”

Lagarde: “So its regressive, it is good. There are lots of tax experts in the room. And fiscal experts, and I’m very pleased that they hear you say that. And they all say that two things in life which are absolutely certain. One is death, the other one is tax. So you use one to defer the other one.”

Bloomberg: “That’s correct. That is exactly right. Well said.”

H/T Americans for Tax Reform