Dem game plan: If at first you don’t succeed, try again

December 6, 2019

Impeachment is never ending strategy

Since the election results came in November 6, 2016, shell-shocked Democrats have never stopped reeling. Flyover country voters — minus five outliers, (Nevada, Colorado, New Mexico, Minnesota and Illinois) which joined the leftist coastal states — rejected scandal plagued Hillary Clinton and put Donald Trump in the White House. 

Impeachment talk started not long after. Despondent Democrats were not in a mood to wait until the next election to right what they consider an egregious, unfathomable wrong…mainstream American voters overwhelmingly electing Republican Trump president.

Now with the Dems moving forward with their sham impeachment, reality has set in. It can move through the House, where an initially reluctant Speaker Nancy Pelosi has fallen in line with the younger, radical new guard. But they face the reality of a Republican majority Senate. Currently, the U.S. Senate has 53 Republicans and 47 Democrats — including two independents who caucus with the Democrats, making the GOP majority precariously slim.

Thirty-four (34) senate seats will be on the ballot in 2020 — including a special election in here in Arizona. Democrats will only need to gain 3 or 4 seats to take control.  Republican incumbent Sen. Martha McSally is being challenged by gun confiscator, Democrat Mark Kelly AKA “Mr. Gabby Giffords.” Aided by Socialist George Soros‘ ActBlue, Kelly, who clearly states he will “defeat the gun lobby,” has already amassed more money than all other Arizona senate candidates.

Sen. Martha McSally has been endorsed by President Trump. It’s imperative she is reelected or we will be putting President Trump in peril, with a senate that will assuredly vote to remove him. 

Texas Rep. Al Green, a far left Democrat, actually says there is “no limit to the number of times” he and his political clique will try to impeach President Trump:

Republicans don’t just need to vote smart. We need to vote strategically. Our nation’s future depends on it.


Impeachment circus: Dem law prof. channels McCain, mocks kids

December 5, 2019

Constitutional scholar Prof. Jonathan Turley, not a Trump supporter, comes to the president’s defense at impeachment hearing

Democrat partisan Stanford law professor Pamela Karlan, who donated $1,000 to Elizabeth Warren’s presidential campaign, veered off into the stratosphere at the impeachment farce Wednesday when she was asked how the powers of a president differ from those of a British king.

Karlan, a childless, married lesbian, eagerly jumped at the opportunity to slam the Trump family, by invoking their 13-year-old son, saying kings had virtually unlimited authority while the Constitution limits presidential powers. To illustrate her point, she referenced President Trump’s son, Barron.

“The Constitution says there can be no titles of nobility, so while the president can name his son Barron, he can’t make him a baron,” Karlan said to laughter and appreciative applause from the Democrats in the hearing room.

First Lady Melania Trump’s rapid response elicited an apology from the boorish law professor, who later said she regretted her comment.

Karlan’s comments bring to mind the slur that John McCain used to mock Bill and Hillary Clinton’s then-teenage daughter, Chelsea. McCain, appearing at an Arizona fundraiser asked a room full of high dollar donors, “Do you know why Chelsea Clinton is so ugly?” He then provided his own answer, saying, “Because Janet Reno (then-U.S. Attorney General) is her father.” Mannish and single, Reno was 6′ 2”.

Pamela Karlan stood in stark contrast to Constitutional scholar and George Washington University Law professor Jonathan Turley, who told the House Judiciary Committee that he did not vote for Donald Trump for president, but said the Democrats were abusing their power in bringing this “slipshod” partisan case and “setting a dangerous precedent.” Turley, cautioned against the impeachment, saying that to proceed on this course against President Trump based on the current evidence “would be to expose every future president to the same type of inchoate impeachment.” His full statement can be viewed here.

 


George Soros’ dedication to stealing elections

December 2, 2019

Dems 2020 Election Strategy: If you can’t beat ’em, cheat ‘em

We recently happened upon The Pickering Post, an Australian site whose well-researched article on voter fraud is definitely worth reading — especially since it mentions Arizona among the states where thousands of “mis-votes” were deemed to be “calibration errors.”

During the 2016 election cycle a Soros-funded group ran televised ads attacking then incumbent Maricopa County Attorney Bill Montgomery, who is now an Arizona Supreme Court Justice. At the time unknown Democrat Diego Rodriguez entrance into the race was considered a yawner until Soros pumped $1.3 million into the race against Montgomery, who nonetheless won reelection. Soros also funded Maricopa County Sheriff Paul Penzone to the tune of nearly $3 million, defeating popular 6-term Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Penzone’s second effort.

Soros spent millions in 2015 and 2016 funding campaigns to defeat local prosecutors around the country and elect new ones who back his far left criminal justice reform measures. Chicago prosecutor Kim Foxx, who purposely dropped the ball on Jussie Smollett’s criminal contrivance, was funded by Soros who donated $408,000 in her campaign PAC.

Author Howell Woltz details the deliberate deception. As an example, he writes:

“Imagine Illinois Republican Jim Moynihan’s surprise. In the recent election, he pressed the button beside his own name at the Schaumburg Public Library and the “Smartmatic” voting machine registered his vote for his Democrat Socialist opponent.”

The ABC mentioned in the post is Australian Broadcasting Corporation not to be confused with American Broadcasting Company. Australia’s national broadcaster was founded 90 years ago, and principally funded by direct grants from the Australian government.

The man behind the voluminous curtain of fraud is none other than George Soros. Check out the Discover the Networks page dedicated to exposing Soros’ tentacles reaching into a vast web of organizations.

POLITICO previously exposed George Soros’ behind the scenes efforts to effect aquiet overhaul the U.S. Justice System.” This is serious business and we need to be fully aware of Soros‘ long range plans to dismantle the United States as we know it. He has long expressed his disdain for national sovereign borders.

Soros’ most recently estimated net worth is $8.3 Billion. Don’t be tempted to take comfort in the fact that Soros is 89 years old.  He has five children, at least two of whom, Jonathan Tivadar Soros, 49, and his half-brother Alexander Soros, 34, are dedicated to continuing their father’s quest for worldwide domination.


Dem Michael Bloomberg BEFORE he was a Presidential candidate

December 1, 2019

Far Left billionaire Michael Bloomberg says raising taxes on poor people is a “good thing.” (Speaking at event with International Monetary Fund’s Christine Lagarde: April 19, 2018)

Michael Bloomberg: “Some people say, well, taxes are regressive. But in this case, yes they are. That’s the good thing about them because the problem is in people that don’t have a lot of money. And so, higher taxes should have a bigger impact on their behavior and how they deal with themselves. So, I listen to people saying ‘oh we don’t want to tax the poor.’ Well, we want the poor to live longer so that they can get an education and enjoy life. And that’s why you do want to do exactly what a lot of people say you don’t want to do.

The question is do you want to pander to those people? Or do you want to get them to live longer? There’s just no question. If you raise taxes on full sugary drinks, for example, they will drink less and there’s just no question that full sugar drinks are one of the major contributors to obesity and obesity is one of the major contributors to heart disease and cancer and a variety of other things.

So, it’s like saying, ‘I don’t want to stop using coal because coal miners will go out of work, will lose their jobs.’ We have a lot of soldiers in the United States in the US Army, but we don’t want to go start a war just to give them something to do and that’s exactly what you’re saying when you say ‘well, let’s keep coal killing people because we don’t want coal miners to lose their jobs.’ The truth of the matter is that there aren’t very many coal miners left anyways and we can find other things for them to do. But the comparison is: a life or a job. Or, taxes or life? Which do you want to do? Take your poison.”

Lagarde: “So its regressive, it is good. There are lots of tax experts in the room. And fiscal experts, and I’m very pleased that they hear you say that. And they all say that two things in life which are absolutely certain. One is death, the other one is tax. So you use one to defer the other one.”

Bloomberg: “That’s correct. That is exactly right. Well said.”

H/T Americans for Tax Reform


Impeachment farce causes java desperation

November 21, 2019

Slippery Trump-despiser Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, obviously afflicted with Trump Derangement Syndrome, embarrassed himself during the interminable, farcical impeachment effort intended to undo an election Democrats refuse to accept. Despite his testimony that he has never spoken directly with President Trump, Vindman admitted to advising his Ukrainian counterpart, Volodymyr Zelensky, on how to comport himself in his communication with Trump.

But it was Emma Dumain, a congressional reporter with McClatchy News, who stole the spotlight. Tilting her head back, she made sure she was getting every last drop of her coffee — to ensure she stayed awake listening to insubordinate Vindman’s partisan blather.

Watch her in action:

H/T Colin Jones


Dem witness admits Obama admin concerns re: Hunter Biden

November 16, 2019

Few Arizonans had even a passing familiarity with New York Congresswoman Elise Stefanik until Friday when she adroitly zoned in on former U.S. ambassador to the Ukraine Marie Yovanovitch before the House Intelligence Committee where she is the sole Republican woman.

Yovanovitch, an Obama appointee who was replaced by the Trump administration, admitted that she was briefed by the Obama administration on Hunter Biden’s position with the Ukrainian firm Burisma Holdings and conceded it had the appearance of a conflict of interest.

Yovanovitch admitted that the Obama administration prepared her for her confirmation as ambassador with practice questions about Hunter Biden and his involvement in Ukraine. Hunter, the son of Obama’s Vice President Joe Biden was receiving more than $80,000 a month from Burisma, one of Ukraine’s largest energy companies, while his father was Obama’s point man for Ukraine policy. The younger Biden lacked any experience in natural gas, outside of his gene pool.

“You testified that in this particular practice Q&A with the State Department, it wasn’t just generally about Burisma and corruption, it was specifically about Hunter Biden and Burisma. Is that correct?” Stefanik asked.

Yovanovitch answered, “Yes.”

A stoic, blinking Adam Schiff appeared stunned as he watched the exposure of his impeachment scheme. Stefanik boldly referred to his “regime of secrecy,” and accused him of “making up the rules.”

As part of her reelection campaign, on Sept. 25, 2019, U.S. Rep. Stefanik announced her opposition to the impeachment of President Trump.


Markets attest impeachment scheme flops with Americans

November 14, 2019

The best indicator that the Democrats farcical impeachment inquiry, conducted in secret until Wednesday and hinging on the testimony of an unnamed “whistleblower” is a dud, is evident in the stock market response:

Here’s where the markets settled Wednesday, November 13, at the end of regular equity trading:

Dow (^DJI): +0.33%, or 92.1 points, surging to a new 52-week high

S&P 500 (^GSPC): +0.07%, or 2.2 points

Nasdaq (^IXIC): -0.05%, or 3.99 points

10-year Treasury yield (^TNX): -2.3 bps to 1.886%

Gold (GC=F): +0.76% to $1,464.70 per ounce

This is at the close of day after the embarrassing spectacle put on by Adam Schiff and his band of leftists who made invalidating the 2016 election and pushing for the impeachment of President Trump their foremost obsession since before he took the oath of office.

Fitting the description of the circus it is, Pissi Myles,* a super-size grotesque “drag queen” decked out in a gigantic blonde bouffant wig and flaming red iridescent mini-dress with cutaway shoulders, was permitted access.

The Dems claimed this would be a bi-partisan effort, yet not a single Republican voted for this investigation.

 A resolution authorizing public hearings and laying the groundwork for eventual proceedings in the Judiciary Committee passed by a vote of 232 to 196. All but two Democrats voted for the measure, with all Republican members voting against it. The chamber’s sole independent, Justin Amash (MI), joined the Democrats in voting for passage.

Many of today’s conservatives were raised by Democrat parents who lived through the Great Depression or its aftermath. Today’s vengeful and out-of-control Democrat Party is not the one they knew. They would be appalled.

* H/T Photos Daily Mail