Fulfilling Biden admin’s agenda: Census distortions benefit democrats

The U.S. Census takes place every ten years. The fundamental reason for the headcount, according to the U.S.  Census Bureau’s website is to comply with “The Constitution of the United States, Article I, Section 2, which states. “Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers…”

“Apportionment is the process of dividing the 435 memberships, or seats, in the U.S. House of Representatives among the 50 states, based on the state population counts that result from each decennial census. These results determine the number of seats each state will have in the U.S. House of Representatives for the next 10 years.”

Obviously it is critically important. With democrats in control, vigilance is crucial — which is why we direct our readers to  “Census Bureau Admits Overcounting 7 Blue States, Just 1 Red State,” written by Hans von Spakovsky, whose impressive bio follows his photo.

The Census Bureau, mandated by the U.S. Constitution, is part of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Its qualified director Robert L. Santos, is irrelevantly identified as being the first Hispanic to head the agency. He was appointed by Joe Biden, who puts a premium on genetic factors outside of our control.

The Census Bureau, mandated by the U.S. Constitution, is part of the U.S. Department of Commerce. Its qualified director Robert L. Santos, is irrelevantly identified as being the first Hispanic to head the agency. He was appointed by Joe Biden, who puts a premium on genetic factors outside of our control. Even the FBI, whose stated mission is to “Protect the American people and uphold the Constitution of the United States,” has shamefully fallen into the “Diversity and Inclusion” contrivance.

Mark Levin reveals dem duplicity amid Trump raid: TV at its finest

We’ve spent our lifetimes with television…seeing the good, bad, mediocre and occasionally something so spectacular it will stay with us. The most recent Mark Levin nationally syndicated program titled, “Mar-A-Lago Raid Fallout, Sunday On Life, Liberty and Levin” falls into the rare, spectacular category. Civil rights lawyer Leo Terrell, a former democrat who saw the light and became a dedicated Trump supporter, and brilliant conservative author Victor Davis Hanson joined Mark Levin on “Life, Liberty & Levin” Sunday, August 14 at 8pm (ET) on Fox News.

It is our hope our readers can open this link and view the program, or would have seen it during one of the two instances it recently ran. The program was packed with solid information, delivered by three accomplished political observers, who each expressed alarm at the degradation of our Constitutional rights by the democrat party elites who work double time to disable any future aspirations of former President Donald Trump. It is both enlightening and infuriating. Levin minces no words on Twitter.

Repeating a lie doesn’t make it true

The U.S. Supreme Court did not outlaw abortions. The justices, in a 5-4 decision, voted to send the matter back to the states, for their own legislatures to individually decide. Fifty states will not all walk in lockstep. Democrats, however, fearing a massive loss in the midterm elections in a backlash vote to Biden’s irresponsible actions and onerous inflation that is having an excruciating effect on Americans, are using abortion to bolster their candidates. Protesting crowds of leftists are easily activated. They come equipped with signs, slogans and super-size quantities of rage. It’s become a career for hordes of them. The issue is of less consequence than the ability to amass, harass and engage in destruction.

Imagine campaigning on dead babies.

“The Constitution does not mention abortion. Further, there is no such built-in right in the Constitution as part of the 14th Amendment. The 14th Amendment guarantees certain rights not explicitly mentioned in the Constitution, but any such right must be well rooted in the nation’s history and customs. It is time to give the Constitution its priority, and return the issue to elected officials,” jointly wrote the affirming justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett.

In fact, the justices said that although various rights can be found in the American Constitution that are not explicitly written, the right to abortion is not one of them, because it was not “deeply rooted” in American existence when the Constitution was written in the 18th century.

“The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. The authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives,” states the majority opinion.

We should all rejoice in those rational words.

They logically counter the latest outrageous trend being embraced by Planned Parenthood, the nation’s largest abortion provider, and the radical ACLU — using the issue to fund raise — which contend that bisexual, transgender, non-binary men can become pregnant and need abortions.

We are living in a world where absurdities and deceit have replaced medical facts and rational thinking.

SCOTUS decision monumental win for Second Amendment

Trump’s legacy: Seating three conservative justices on US Supreme Court

The U.S. Supreme Court on Thursday struck down a New York law that placed strict restrictions on carrying concealed firearms in public for self defense, finding its requirement that applicants seeking a license to carry a concealed handgun demonstrate a “proper cause” to do so in public is unconstitutional.

In a 6-3 ruling, the Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision upholding New York’s 108-year-old law limiting who can obtain a license to carry a concealed handgun in public. Opponents of the measure warned that a ruling from the high court invalidating the restrictions could threaten gun limitations in several states and lead to more firearms on city streets.

Justice Clarence Thomas delivered the majority opinion, writing that New York’s “proper-cause requirement” prevented law-abiding citizens from exercising their Second Amendment right.

The National Rifle Association (NRA) addresses the victory, calling it “the most significant Second Amendment ruling in more than a decade.” Jason Ouimet, executive director, National Rifle Association Institute for Legislative Action (NRA-ILA) and Wayne LaPierre, NRA executive vice president discuss the ruling and the role the NRA has played to bring about these triumphs on behalf of law abiding citizens.  If you’re not already a member, JOIN! The NRA has been reliable stalwart in protecting our rights.

Uneducated students protest US Constitution’s 2nd Amendment

In a coordinated effort, anti-gun rallies were reportedly held in hundreds of U.S. cities across the nation Saturday. Many were student-led.

The Second Amendment (read the brief highlighted reference to the impact of Heller decision) to our Constitution took a back seat to emotion, as the rallying cry of the group known as “March for Our Lives,“ made restricting gun ownership the focus of their attention.

From its website, under the heading, Our Demands for the Biden-Harris Administration, is this absurdity carrying the price tag of “at least $1 billion in funding”:

“Much like the COVID-19 pandemic, and the HIV pandemic before it, the gun violence epidemic requires a unified, national plan with a public health lens. President Biden must appoint a Director of Gun Violence Prevention and dedicate at least $1 billion in funding to combat gun violence, rebuilding our research and data collection infrastructure while supporting community-based violence intervention programming. March for Our Lives is urging the Biden-Harris Administration to lead the federal response by meeting the following demands…listed under the link in this paragraph.”

The New York Post provides insights into the abysmal lack of American history taught in our public schools as teachers admit they “teach to the test.” What would motive students’ desire to protect our unique Constitutional-based nation, when they are ignorant of what separates us from Socialist and Communist dictatorships?

It is the public school system run by unionist teachers — not the Second Amendment — that desperately needs to be reevaluated.

Radical author claims “trash” US Constitution must be replaced

Haitian immigrant benefiting from First Amendment’s freedom of speech opines, “Wealthy slavers and racist misogynists” founded USA

Americans rightly esteem our U.S. Constitution, which sets us apart from other forms of government. The document which was ratified June 21, 1789, has been amended 27 times. Our Founders were brilliant patriots with an eye to the future, who labored at putting together a document that would grow with the then-young country. America is known as a nation of laws — a founding principle. It remains the core of what defines who we are as Americans.

John Hanson, writing for the Political Insider, introduces us to Constitution hater and leftist journalist Elie Mystal, who recently authored a book titled, “Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution.”  Mystal claims the Constitution should be replaced with something “more inclusive.”

Mystal calls the Constitution “trash” that was written by wealthy slavers and racist misogynists. He goes on to denigrate our laws saying they have since “been mostly interpreted by wealthy white legislators to take away the rights of minorities, women and the LGBTQ community.”

If this raging Haitian-born opportunist followed his roots back to his African homeland, he wouldn’t be a Harvard-educated author, with a law degree, making televised guest appearances to push a book or vilify the Constitution-based nation that has provided him limitless opportunities.

SCOTUS vacancy looms: Justice Breyer pressured to exit

Sen. Chuck Schumer, an ardent leftist, is already heaping Breyer with accolades preceding a final shove

Finally caving to extreme pressure before the midterm elections that could flip the confirming senate, Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer has announced his retirement at the end of the current term in June. The handwriting is on the wall. He has outlived his usefulness.

This lifetime appointment is a high stakes escapade for the democrat powerbrokers who are keenly aware that the chances of replacing Breyer, 83, with a far leftist, decades younger justice would be impeded if they lost control of the U.S. Senate in the 2022 midterm elections.

Biden is not seeking excellence, having already acknowledged that genitalia and ethnicity top his list of qualifications. He is specifically seeking a black female, which means the only white males who would apply would be doing so to give an air of legitimacy to the skewed process.

Overseeing the selection is Biden’s chief of staff Ron Klain, the powerful man behind the curtain, who has long had a hand in other Supreme Court appointments. He was chief counsel to the Senate Judiciary Committee, worked for Bill Clinton as associate counsel, advising on his judicial nominations, including radical Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg who stated she preferred the South African constitution to ours. Ginsburg also admitted the reason she fell asleep during then-Pres. Barack Obama’s State of the Nation speech was because she had too much too drink (brief video) which MSM newscasters found humorous. Klain also played a key role in advising Obama to fill high court vacancies with leftist Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. Though you might not be familiar with Klain, he has outsized power, especially in the current administration where the president is clearly a mentally and physically impaired incompetent.

Given the state of governmental chaos, is it any wonder that 41% of voters still don’t believe that Joe Biden won the 2020 presidential election fairly? This June 23, 2021 survey by Rasmussen Reports found that 55% of likely U.S. voters support forensic audits of election results to ensure there is no voter fraud.

SCOTUS to hear race-based college admissions cases

Within two months of his inauguration, Joe Biden’s handlers began hastily reversing the Trump administration‘s policies negating the disproportionate use of race in college admissions. While the Trump administration sought a narrowly tailored use of race or even color-blind admission standards, Biden advanced the practice of using race as a principal factor in selecting students, all for achieving the insultingly illogical goals of racial equity and diversity. High grades and achievement took a back seat to race-based factors, although melanin, the primary determinant of skin pigment, is something over which none of us have any control.

The U.S. Supreme Court will hear a case challenging the practice of affirmative action, which factors race into college admissions. Lawsuits assert that Harvard University,* a private institution, and the University of North Carolina,* a state college, discriminate against Asian American applicants, who frequently achieve higher scores than their student counterparts.

In the Harvard case, petitioners argue that the private university’s policy unfairly disadvantages Asian-American applicants in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act. In the North Carolina case, petitioners allege that the policy of the public university violates the Equal Protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Biden’s handlers indicated that his administration will aggressively promote affirmative action with his nomination of Kristen Clarke to lead the Civil Rights Division of the Department of Justice, which oversees the department’s position on cases related to affirmative action.

Clarke was previously president of the Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, an organization that actively defends colleges’ use of race as a key admission factor. She is a staunch advocate of using admissions processes to achieve a student body that is more racially diverse than its applicant pool.

Don’t hold your breathe waiting for a decision on this important matter. The court is not expected to hear the consolidated cases until next term, meaning a decision is not likely until later this year or early next year, according to the informative Ballotpedia.

Freedom to Cheat Act: Left craves total fed takeover of elections

Lacking evidence, radical dems push farce of voter suppression

The latest deceit emanating from the dems is that voting is denied to vast numbers of Americans, although the U.S. Constitution addressed this in 1870. The local newspaper, which functions as an arm of the democrat party recently headlined a biased report, “AZ students restart hunger strike for voting bill.” The missing word before students is “ignorant.”

The nearly 600-page, fraudulently-named, Freedom to Vote Act empowers election day registration along with expansion of vote-by-mail and early voting. It also restricts removing voters from voter rolls regardless of whether they have moved or are no longer eligible voters prior to elections. It also requires all states to implement on-line voter registration. Felons are welcomed as voters. And for good measure, it also establishes Election Day as a paid federal holiday. Both of Arizona’s dem senators were co-sponsors of, and voted for, passage of the devious bill. The legislation is named for the late U.S. Rep. John Lewis to give it heft, contrived to expand voting rights for black Americans, which are already guaranteed by the Fifteenth Amendment.

Today we bring our readers “The Freedom to Cheat Act: The Radical Left’s Latest Attempt to Undermine Our Democracy,” a must-read article by Ken Blackwell. (Impressive bio under link).

Another enlightening commentary appearing in National Review is “‘Voting Rights’ Has Become a Meaningless Political Slogan,” by Charles C. W. Cooke. They are both informative articles. The few minutes of reading provide a greater sense of the deception passing as fact by the democrat party.

REMINDER TO OUR READERS: In accordance with our 2020 established policy, the word “democrat” or its derivatives will no longer be capitalized on this site. The exception is when the word is capitalized in quotes or beginning a sentence.

A brilliant, detailed exposé of devious dems driven by Trump hatred

Trump Derangement Syndrome is a more serious contagion than any virus

In his recent Townhall commentary, “Who Are the Real Insurrectionists?” Victor Davis Hanson indicts, with stunning accuracy, those we may have simply dismissed as “the other party.” That term is too bland to describe the grotesque U.S. Constitution consuming monster that many of our parents and/or grandparents regarded favorably. It would be unrecognizable to them in 2022.

If you read only one article today, let Hanson’s wise observation be it. Then forward it to others.