JD Hayworth sends strong signal to conservatives in AG’s race

Hayworth joins Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Sen. Judy Burges and an impressive list of state Senators and Representatives, law enforcement professionals, NRA, former Senate President Russell Pearce, and Arizona’s conservative voters in supporting Attorney General Tom Horne

Dear Tom:

You have done a very effective job as Arizona’s Attorney General; that’s why I’m proud to endorse your candidacy for re-election.

Your insistence on truly protecting our Borders and opposing Amnesty for illegals has earned you the scorn of the Open Borders/ Establishment crowd.

I hope that Arizona Republicans won’t again be deceived by candidates who talk tough during the campaign season…only to slink back into working for Amnesty once safely re-elected.

Your consistent, conservative approach is greatly appreciated.

Good Luck in next week’s Primary Election!

Sincerely,

J.D. Hayworth

United States Congressman for Arizona

1995-2007

11 Responses to JD Hayworth sends strong signal to conservatives in AG’s race

  1. American Dad says:

    JD Hayworth has more integrity in his little finger than the entire Bronovich-supporting Team McCain.

    John McCain, Jeff McFlake, Jon McKyl and Bill McMontgomery are all part and parcel of what’s wrong with the Arizona Republican Party…the establishment elites have taken it over and are doing their damnest to recreate it in their image, which is most assuredly NOT conservative. They are the Republicrat version of Barack Obama who has stated his desire to ‘fundamentally transform” America. Further, they and the suddenly reemerging John Shadegg, are all onboard the amnesty train. Make no mistake,Mark Bronovich is their guy!

  2. Frankly Speaking says:

    Thank you, JD!! Great support for a fine man from another. I very much appreciate this endorsement for the best Attorney General Arizona has had iin many years. Think back to Janet Napolitano and Terry Goddard if you want your blood to run cold. Republicrat Grant Woods was once John McCain’s Chief of Staff! Except for Tom Horne. it’s been a round robin of lefties, except for Republican Bob Corbin and he was elected in 1979.

  3. State Delegate says:

    Having run against the repeatedly censured RINO McCain, JD Hayworth is the anti-McCain if anyone is.

    His endorsement of Arizona Attorney General Tom Horne would be prized by any conservative and sends a great message. Conversely, challenger Mark Brnovich has the entire disreputable establishment behind him. How much clearer could that be?

    Brnovich has Jan Brewer, Jon McKyl, Bill McMontgomery, the endorsement of the radically leftwing Arizona Republic, and even the amnesty lovin’ Nancy Barto and Adam Driggs on his team. Those names would sure get me to vote for him! (NOT!)

    Señor Juan McAmnesty has been warned to keep a low profile, which is why he is lying low in so many RINO races.

  4. greenvalleygal says:

    Thank you from the bottom of my heart, JD! We are Horne strong! John McCain held a town hall in Green Valley, AZ today. Worries in AZ CD 2 about Chuck Wooten defeating the anointed candidate Martha McSally? Woo-woo WOOTEN!

  5. Borderhawk says:

    Hopefully the Rick Perry indictment and smear; puts the Tom Horne attacks in context to the low information voters. Perry is a RINO but the indictment puts it in context that anyone can make up a bunch of BS and find a court somewhere to file it.

  6. jojo says:

    McSally is a perfect example of finding courts and suing. She sued Wooten claiming he didn’t have enough valid signatures. It was quickly dismissed after costing the taxpayers of Pima & Cochise counties over $100,000.00. She doesn’t care one twit about the tax payers. She is McCain’s acolyte bought and paid for by the establishment GOP in AZ. No wonder people are leaving and becoming Independents. We want citizen selected candidates like Command Chief Master Sergeant (Ret.) Chuck Wooten. Get out there and help us folks. We’ve got ’em on the run.

  7. Seeing Red AZ says:

    Note to Westnash,
    Between 3:31 am, and 7:38 am this morning, you have written seven comments on this and other posts, which contribute nothing to the discussions other than insults, snide remarks and demands that we do your bidding. Early on the decision was made that your comments would be held in “moderation,” meaning they would not go up automatically. We have been sabotaged in the past and only those commenters with an established history of clarity, not necessarily agreement with our views, miss being reviewed. In hindsight, our decision in your case was not only correct, it was brilliant.

  8. westnash says:

    Facts are pesky things SRAZ, so why let the truth get in the way of a good story. ALL of my posts are relevant to the topic at hand and probably don’t toe the company line. You regulate your site to being a minority of a minority by refusing to post what is not atta boys of all your favorite people. There are none of us that have no warts. Some just have a lot more.

    Giffords and Sienema applaud your views.

    • Seeing Red AZ says:

      We value our commenters and have all too frequently given you your say, curtailing only your slurs, petulance and demands for us to act to suit your whims. It has now beome obvious this conservative site is not a good fit with your views. You know the old line about not letting the door hit you on the way out. It applies here.

      • westnash says:

        You have the censor switch and have proven you will use it whenever it suits you. I will continue to say what I think and you can choose to publish what makes you happy.

        I have little doubt that the Arizona Democrat Party would be willing to provide support for your site, so long as you continue in the same vain.