Project Veritas: Sanders’ key staffer predicts “cities burn” if Trump reelected

January 15, 2020

…predicts violence at DNC, advocates for brainwash-style “reeducation” of Americans

It would be easy to dismiss Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders as an irrelevant, aged Socialist who suffered a heart attack a few months ago and shouldn’t be on the presidential campaign trail. Not only has he remained in the race — promoting free college and health care, but Kyle Jurek, a Sanders’ “top-tier campaign organizer,” is candid via his profanity-laced dialogue as to the need for that “education.”

See it all in the most recent James O’Keefe Project Veritas undercover video exposé released Tuesday.

Predicting there would be violence against police at the 2020 Democratic National Convention in Milwaukee and “cities burn” if President Trump wins reelection, Jurek stated, “F–ing cities burn, I mean, we don’t have a lot of time left, we have to save f–ing human civilization.”

“We’re going to make 1978 (he meant 1968 when the DNC convention held in Chicago pitted protestors against police) look like a f–ing Girl Scout f–ing cookout,” adding, “The cops are going to be the ones that are getting f–ing beaten in Milwaukee. They’re going to call out the National Guard for that s–t. I promise you that.”

“If Bernie doesn’t get the nomination, or it goes to the second round at the DNC convention, f–ing Milwaukee will burn,” Jurek predicted. “It’ll start in Milwaukee, and then when the police push back on that, other cities will just f–ing (explosion sound).”

Prior to working for Sanders, Jurek was a short time employee with the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in 2018.

In the video, Kyle Jurek said that Trump supporters would need to be re-educated, comparing them to Nazi supporters at the end of World War II, and expressed support for Soviet-style gulags, which he said were “a lot better than what the CIA has told us.”

 Asked whether “some of these MAGA people could even be re-educated,” Jurek replied, “We gotta f–ing try,” adding that such reeducation was an aim of Sanders‘ call for free tuition at public universities.

“So like in Nazi Germany, after the fall of the Nazi party, there was a s–t ton of the populace that was f–ing Nazi-fied,” Jurek said. “Germany had to spend billions of dollars reeducating their f–ing people to not be Nazis. We’re probably going to have to do the same f–ing thing here. That’s kind of what Bernie’s whole ‘hey, free education for everybody,’ is about…because we’re going to have to teach you not to be a f–ing Nazi.”

“There’s a reason Josef Stalin had gulags” and that “gulags were actually meant for, like, reeducation.”

The video also depicts Jurek taking shots at less radical liberals and media outlets, saying, “Walk into that MSNBC studio, drag those m–––ers out by their hair, and light them on fire in the streets.” If “they f–ing take Bernie from us,” he said, “then we have nothing else left to lose.”

This is Part II:

Trump impeachment: Oscar worthy theatrical production

December 19, 2019

Absence of bi-partisan effort exposed: Insufficient votes to remove the president in the senate keeps Pelosi from moving forward with sham impeachment

The impeachment talk that began in November 2016, immediately following the inauguration of Donald Trump as America’s 45th president, culminated Wednesday with a theatrical production leading to articles of impeachment filed in the U.S. House. The contrivance could hardly be called a bi-partisan effort since not a single Republican voted for it. In fact, they were joined by two dissenting Democrats and another who refused to vote. From its inception, the entire effort has been steeped in rank Trump hatred.

Staged to convey a somber tone to the gleefully awaited event, the leftist members melodramatically dressed in black and declared the need to remove the president so they could face their children and grandchildren. Since more than a few qualify as senior citizens, they could have mentioned their great-grandchildren for added impact. Then the all day and evening performance bizarrely veered off into the stratosphere when Speaker Nancy Pelosi announced she may not send the articles of impeachment to the (Republican majority) senate.

Despite ongoing efforts to smear him, President Trump remains immensely popular, drawing record crowds to his rallies. He smoothly held one in Battle Creek, Michigan yesterday as his Democrat antagonists were poised to obliterate his presidency. Americans, benefiting from his economic programs, waited for hours in sub-zero temperatures to hear him speak.

It’s not only Trump and his policies the left loathes. They also despise us, because they know we will reelect him in 2020. They lie with impunity and hate with vigor. We are the “smelly Walmart shoppers,” described by Barack Obama as “clinging to out guns and bibles.” Like schoolyard bullies, they disingenuously promote the notion that Hillary Clinton would be in the White House if it wasn’t for rabidly sexist and racist Republican voters.

Skipping the double talk in favor of quadruple talk, Pelosi was able to keep a straight face as she said, “We’re not sending [the articles] tonight because it’s difficult to determine who the managers would be until we see the arena in which we will be participating. So far we haven’t seen anything that looks fair to us, so hopefully it will be fairer and when we see what that is, we’ll send our managers.” That the word “fair” was able to escape her unprincipled lips is a marvel.

 In a recent commentary, the brilliant Victor Davis Hanson, wrote:

“Given the current criteria of the Trump impeachment, Barack Obama easily would have been impeached: in Fast and Furious, the Iran nuclear deal, and Benghazi, Obama stonewalled congressional requests or kept critical information from the public and Congress. On illegal immigration, Obama simply made up or ignored laws in the manner earlier that he said to have done so would be antidemocratic and monarchial.

Every impeachment charge against Trump far more easily could have been lodged against an imperial Obama presidency—without mentioning that Obama ultimately may be found to be knowledgeable of the entire CIA, FBI, and Justice Department surveilling of an opposition campaign and sabotage of a presidential transition.”

The editorial in today’s issue of the steeply declining, Hillary-endorsing Arizona Republic is topped with an absurd headline, “The best way forward now? We, the people, get to vote.” The leftist editorial board conveniently forgets, we already did.

* Photo courtesy of New York Post

Partisan impeachment farce moves forward in the House

December 18, 2019

Pelosi, Nadler out, President Donald Trump responds

The vote on the Dem’s partisan-based impeachment contrivance, specifically aimed at overturning the 2016 vote of the American people, is scheduled today. After hours of showboating “debate,” on the rules, the final vote is expected to take place between 6:30 and 7:30 p.m (ET). Watch here beginning this morning.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who apparently no longer wants to be the face associated with this sham has turned duties over to U.S. Rep. Diana DeGette (D-CO). By an intriguing coincidence, House Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler was mysteriously called away to an undisclosed family emergency in New York City Tuesday, missing the last procedural step before articles of impeachment come to the floor.

President Donald Trump, not one to silently let his sworn enemies define him, responded with this 6-page letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Pelosi has played the role of Whip, reining in non-compliant Dems, with what are acknowledged to be threats. For many, it will be the only significant vote they ever cast. Americans, who stunned the Hillary-supporting Dems in 2016 will not be inclined to give them second terms. Vote map here.

The House is on its sham, party-line course to impeach the president. But a two-thirds vote in the Senate is required to convict and remove him from office. The Senate needs 67 votes to remove President Trump. It will not meet that marker. Even if all Democrats vote for conviction, no less than 20 Republicans also must support removing the president. Not a single Republican has fallen into that camp.

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) was quoted as saying, “I’ve written this whole process off. I think this is a bunch of B.S. I don’t think the president did anything wrong.”

We’re happy to have Graham in President Trump’s corner, yet it’s intriguing to ponder if he’d have been so magnanimous if his Trump-hating buddy John McCain was still alive. It’s worth remembering that it was a jealous and unapologetic John McCain who personally hand carried the discredited Steele “dossier” filled with vile, and now disproved, allegations about Trump, to then-FBI Director James Comey. The controversial document was funded by the Democratic National Committee and Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign.  McCain previously referred to Clinton as a “rock star” he could support for president.

Black murderers morph into white supremacists

December 13, 2019

Facts are incidental, take back seat to anti-Trump agenda

According to leftist Joy Behar, one of the coarse fanatics on “The View,” these are the faces (pictured below) of white supremacists. David Anderson and Francine Graham have been identified as the assassins at the New Jersey kosher grocery store shooting that left 6 people dead, including a responding police officer, who was the father of five. The two murderers were among the dead.

Lacking any facts, but riding her agenda at full speed, radical Behar immediately jumped to the wrong conclusion, in her ongoing desire to smear President Donald Trump, who she considers as the overarching specter behind all evil.

The carnage is being investigated as an act of domestic terrorism.

In a now deleted tweet captured by Andy Ngo,  U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib, self-identified as a “Palestinian American and proud  Muslima,” was also eager to blame “white supremacy,” which she noted, “kills.”

Radicals determined to take joy out of holidays

November 30, 2019

…as anarchists and their climate change theology rev up

Headlines blasted economic doom and gloom citing lower numbers of Black Friday sale shoppers in stores, while short-shrifting the fact that on-line sales have burgeoned. The anti-Trump media would like Americans to think the economy is collapsing, when just the opposite is true. reports the stock market has hit19 new highs in 2019.

Americans were reported to have spent a record $4.4 billion online on Thanksgiving Day alone. Nearly half of those purchases were purchased on smartphones, up 19 percent from last year.  Online spending for Black Friday is estimated at $7.4 billion this year — which doesn’t reflect the masses of shoppers who shopped in person.

The excellent economic news had no bearing on radical climate change activists such as those associated with eco-protest group Extinction Rebellion (XR) or kept them from inciting disruptions. The aim of the group which claims to have chapters in dozens of countries is to create chaos surrounding their core issue of climate change. The fact that the matter remains up for debate within the scientific community, many unequivocally asserting climate fluctuation is cyclical,* is of no consequence to the disrupters, who have staged public “die ins,” shut down airports, roadways, bridges and shopping centers, while endangering public safety.

Arrests are not an inconvenience for XR activists, rather they are part of the plan, as one of the organizers stated, “Our aim is creating a law and order crisis that the state can no longer really contain.”

Its maniacal tactic is to declare the absolute correctness of unproven issues and use it to create mayhem and social unrest. Their hope is their goal of anarchy will follow.

This NASA Science site which we have previously referred to is now accompanied by a disclaimer: “This page is kept for historical purposes, but the content is no longer actively updated.” Dissent has been silenced as further evidenced by search engines that have now obliterated all but prevailing opinion.

A strident Swedish teenage climate activist who insulted the President of the United States, encouraged worldwide student school strikes for climate and blasted United Nations representatives with her “How Dare You” speech — threatening, “We will not let you get away with this…we will never forgive you” — has won. It has yet to be explained how she was able to address the United Nations.

The issue has been hijacked by anarchists and a brash teen afflicted with Asperger Syndrome who is the daughter of an opera singer and an actor. She is mysteriously financed and does not appear to attend school — yet she commands international attention as she issues threats and accuses the U.S. and industrialized nations of “stealing my dreams.” Hatred of America, the most generous nation on the planet, is a guaranteed attention grabber.

No longer private, sex becomes “fluid,” celebrated

November 19, 2019

Leftist AZ Republic drops Page One impeachment focus, when it can spotlight “gender fluidity”

It’s a good bet most of us reached adulthood, surviving nicely, without ever having heard the word “transgender.” It erupted and was planted firmly on the word map by former U.S. Olympic decathlon medal winner, Bruce Jenner. Married to three different women over the years, he decided he wanted to be like them, rather than with them. He began by growing long fingernails, which he had manicured and painted in not-to-be-missed colors. Then came the makeup. Sultry long tresses, followed, of course, by the mandatory hormones and surgeries.  Soon Bruce made a debut as a seductress on the cover of Vanity Fair magazine garbed in slinky white satin, with the words “Call me Caitlyn“ superimposed over what was previously his hairy midsection.

In August 2019, SRAZ wrote,Drag Queen Story Hour: Libraries dedicated to corruption of our kids,” describing kindergarteners being exposed to transgender men, outrageously cross-dressed, coming into the barely out of toddlerhood classrooms to read them fairy tales in an effort to normalize the abnormal.

This American Library Association link and quote is today’s new reality:

“Drag Queen Story Hour (DQSH) is just what it sounds like — drag queens reading stories to children in libraries, schools, and bookstores. DQSH captures the imagination and play of the gender fluidity of childhood and gives kids glamorous, positive, and unabashedly queer role models. In spaces like this, kids are able to see people who defy rigid gender restrictions…”

Monday’s edition of the failing Arizona Republic which revved up its downhill content slide in 2008, celebrates a headstone placed on the grave of a “transgender man who died a century ago… given back his identity.” It describes a man, Nicolai De Raylan, who came to Phoenix in 1906 for his health. He was married to two different women, who we are led to believe never suspected he was actually a she.  Now the Arizona LGBT+ History Project is putting a tombstone on his grave and garners front page attention for doing so.

We wonder if De Raylan, who lived his life as a man, would have approved being outed — whether accurately or not — without his consent. But with the Arizona Republic, agenda takes precedence over all else.



AZ US Rep. Paul Gosar challenged by brassy upstart

November 7, 2019

A bizarre political trend is gaining momentum. It’s exemplified by the Swedish teenage climate change activist who has been the object of adulation by the left after addressing the United Nations, accusing the U.S. and industrialized nations of “stealing my dreams,” and threatening, “We will not let you get away with this…we will never forgive you.”  Her latest admirer is Leonardo DiCaprio, an anti-Trump, high dollar Democrat donor who was recently described as “swooning” over her as he referred to her as “a leader of our time.”  The object of his adulation preemptively stated she would refuse to meet with President Trump — who never issued an invitation.

Scientists at the Natural History Museum in London have officially named a tiny beetle after her. Fittingly, it has no eyes and lacks wings.

Arizonans have their own versions of this new breed of inexperienced aspirants who take on Republican incumbents. A former Martha McSally staffer living in Prescott is eyeing a congressional run. Though not a teen, Anne Marie Ward, who is in her 20’s, has decided to challenge Congressman Paul Gosar.

She is quoted as saying:

“We need to have younger citizens step up and run at every single level to really bring our conservative values back to life at the local, the state, the federal level,” Ward stated. “We have the Democratic Socialist party gaining momentum and the Republican Party losing momentum, and with that shift it’s time for the young generation to step forward and start using their voice to represent our communities again.”

She obviously missed the fact that it is the youth vote, known as millennials, that moved unlikely Bernie Sanders, an acknowledged socialist, within spitting distance of leading the 2016 Democrat ticket. They support radical leftist Elizabeth Warren and turned out to elect extremists Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Ilhan Omar, Ayanna Pressley and Rashida Tlaib to congress. In response, the four women known as “the squad,‘ have irrationally called for lowing the voting age from 18 to 16.

Equally ill-prepared for the U.S. Senate seat he’s announced for, is Daniel McCarthy, 34, who is challenging incumbent U.S. Sen. Martha McSally for one of Arizona’s two senate seats — one already in the clutches of Dem Kyrsten Sinema. McCarthy’s ego-driven entry will do nothing more than aid current challenger, Mark “Mr. Gabby Giffords” Kelly, a gun-grabber, who is being funded by Socialist multi-billionaire George Soros.

Youth is great. We all wish we could keep it and our biceps, permanently ward off wrinkles and graying follicles. But the years bring with them the respectable trade-off of experience and wisdom.

At 60, retired dentist and current AZ CD-4 Congressman, Paul Gosar is just reaching his prime. He’s doing an excellent job in congress. Gosar is a known conservative who earned a Liberty Score “A“ rating from Conservative Review.

His unknown challenger, not even a decade out of her teens, tells us she holds to those same principles. Why, then, does she think we need to replace him?